Orbiting space station is observed to remain always vertically above

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An orbiting space station can only remain vertically above the same point on Earth if it is in a geostationary orbit, which requires it to be positioned above the equator. The discussion clarifies that while the observer does not need to be on the equator, the point directly beneath the satellite must be located there. Geosynchronous satellites, such as telecommunications satellites, achieve this by matching the Earth's angular velocity. The assertion that other orbits can maintain a stationary position above a single point on Earth is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geostationary and geosynchronous orbits
  • Knowledge of angular velocity in orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with satellite positioning and telecommunications
  • Basic principles of Earth’s rotation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of geostationary orbits and their applications
  • Study the differences between geostationary and geosynchronous satellites
  • Explore the role of angular velocity in satellite orbit design
  • Learn about the launch and positioning of telecommunications satellites
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, satellite communication specialists, students of orbital mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of satellite positioning and Earth observation.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Why is it that if an orbiting space station is observed to remain always vertically above the same point on Earth then the observer must be on the equator of Earth?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Ed Quanta said:
Why is it that if an orbiting space station is observed to remain always vertically above the same point on Earth then the observer must be on the equator of Earth?

Why do you think?
 
Strictly speaking the statement isn't true. The observer doesn't need to be on the equator, but the point above which the geosynchronous space station remains stationary must be on the equator. (I am having trouble telling if I wrote that correctly)
 
Here's a hint:
http://smithplanet.com/stuff/orbiter/dockingimages/mapMFD.jpg" is a (randomly Googled) world map with some orbits superimposed on it. Why do the orbits seem to follow nice sine waves instead of straight lines? What properties of the two orbits illustrated would cause the two sine waves to have different amplitudes (heights)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The thesis is wrong. The orbit of the space station will always around the core of the Earth but not neccesarily around the equator. You will see the space station always above you if it has the same angular velocity as the Earth. For example telecommunication satellites work like this. They are put into orbit by high powered rockets so that they have angular velocity the same as that of the Earth.
 
cigster said:
The thesis is wrong. The orbit of the space station will always around the core of the Earth but not neccesarily around the equator. You will see the space station always above you if it has the same angular velocity as the Earth. For example telecommunication satellites work like this. They are put into orbit by high powered rockets so that they have angular velocity the same as that of the Earth.
I am not sure what this person is talking about. There's some misleading info here.
1] What thesis?
2] A satelllite will NOT always be above you if it isn't in an equatorial orbit.
 
cigster said:
The thesis is wrong. The orbit of the space station will always around the core of the Earth but not neccesarily around the equator.
In order for the space station to remain vertically above the same point on the Earth (this is a given condition), the space station must be in an equatorial geosynchronous orbit (i.e., a geostationary orbit). There are no other orbits that satisfy this given condition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
954
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K