I Running on the Space Station compared with running on Earth

Click For Summary
Running on a treadmill aboard the International Space Station (ISS) requires similar effort to running on Earth, provided the elastic straps used to simulate gravity are adjusted to match the astronaut's weight. The mechanics of running, including the need to raise the center of gravity, remain consistent in both environments. However, the use of elastic straps may introduce awkwardness and potential differences in muscle rhythm, possibly leading to unique overuse injuries. While the cardiovascular workout is comparable, the experience and biomechanics may vary due to the nature of the elastic resistance versus gravitational force. Overall, the fundamental effort required to run in microgravity can be effectively similar to that on Earth when conditions are appropriately managed.
  • #31
jbriggs444 said:
Neglecting air resistance, you have to keep your feet under your center of gravity.
I imagine that sort of skill is easy enough to acquire if you already have the Right Stuff. I quite recently used a treadmill for the first time (on Earth) and I had to hang on for a while before being sure of myself.
 
  • Like
Likes Grinkle
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sophiecentaur said:
I imagine that sort of skill is easy enough to acquire if you already have the Right Stuff. I quite recently used a treadmill for the first time (on Earth) and I had to hang on for a while before being sure of myself.
My brother, my sister and myself were allowed to play pretty much as we saw fit in the backyard using an array of stuff such as horizontal ladders, ropes, swings, spools, barrels, crates and tall trees. My parents believed, correctly, that we were aware of our limitations. One evening my dad had a bunch of twelve year olds over from the school where he worked. He had to put away the rope swing because we (several years younger than they) were all performing stunts too dangerous for them to safely imitate.

Sadly, age steals youthful competence.
 
  • #33
jbriggs444 said:
On Earth, that is certainly so. Neglecting air resistance, you have to keep your feet under your center of gravity.

On a treadmill in space, you need to arrange for your contact force to be on a line that intersects with the anchor for the straps. Instead of moving the contact point relative to the center of gravity, you'll want to move the contact point relative to the strap anchor.
It would/should be possible to simulate running uphill / downhill on the space treadmill by the angle of lean of the anchor strap.
Something not possible on Earth except by raising or lowering the bed ( or perhaps that could be done with a horizontal tether attached to your hips attached to the front or rear of the machine depending ).
Something I was to expand on in my previous post.
Apologies to @Grinkle for being too terse and certainly not explanatory.
 
  • Like
Likes Grinkle
  • #34
jbriggs444 said:
Sadly, age steals youthful competence.
The worst thing is the memory. You can work around lack of strength and agility by taking your time but . . . now where was I??
 
  • #35
Fun side note: There is also the exact opposite of the NASA treadmill, one that reduces the effective weight.

 
  • #36
256bits said:
It would/should be possible to simulate running uphill / downhill on the space treadmill by the angle of lean of the anchor strap.
I see. That's interesting - one can make the force vector inclinations with respect to the plane of the running surface match pretty well I would think (gravity vs elastic force). One is going to be 'slammed' a bit with each stride as the bands contract. On earth, one stores up potential energy running up a hill, or one decreases the amount of work the treadmill motor does running on an upwardly inclined belt surface. In space, the elastic will return the non-normal component of the power expended in each stride as it pulls the runner back towards the running surface. The more incline, I believe, the more the difference between the variable spring force and the constant gravity force will be noticed by the runner.

Edit: I was only pondering the uphill case. I don't think changing the angle in the 'backwards' direction to simulate downhill running would work very well.
 
  • Informative
Likes 256bits

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K