Orbits of a Killing vector field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the orbits of a Killing vector field, exploring definitions, sources, and intuitive understandings of the concept. It includes references to literature and personal recommendations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the orbits of a Killing vector field and requests sources for further reading.
  • Another participant provides a link to a resource that discusses the topic.
  • A participant explains that the orbits of a vector field, not necessarily Killing, are solutions to a specific differential equation, emphasizing an intuitive understanding of orbits as following the vector field's direction.
  • A similar explanation is reiterated by the same participant, reinforcing the definition provided.
  • A participant expresses a strong preference for Hall's book on symmetries in general relativity, indicating a personal connection to the material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no explicit consensus or disagreement noted among participants; the discussion remains exploratory with various contributions and recommendations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve any mathematical steps or assumptions related to the definition of orbits or the properties of Killing vector fields.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in general relativity, vector fields, and mathematical physics may find this discussion relevant.

praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
I was wondering what the orbits of a Killing vector field are. Do you have any good sources or reading material for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch07/ch07.html#Section7.1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Given a (not necessarily Killing) vector field [itex]V^\mu(x)[/itex], its "orbits" are solutions [itex]Z^\mu(\lambda)[/itex] to the differential equation [itex]\dot{Z}^\mu(\lambda) = V^\mu(Z(\lambda))[/itex], where the dot is a [itex]\lambda[/itex] derivative. Intuitively, an orbit just "follows the little arrows of the vector field".

That's all there is to it.
 
Sam Gralla said:
Given a (not necessarily Killing) vector field [itex]V^\mu(x)[/itex], its "orbits" are solutions [itex]Z^\mu(\lambda)[/itex] to the differential equation [itex]\dot{Z}^\mu(\lambda) = V^\mu(Z(\lambda))[/itex], where the dot is a [itex]\lambda[/itex] derivative. Intuitively, an orbit just "follows the little arrows of the vector field".

That's all there is to it.


Thanks Sam. I'll do some calculations with this definition and come back if I have further clarifications.
 
Hall's book on symmetries in GR is my favorite, I'd go so far as to say, I love it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K