Order of rotations: precession, nutation, spin

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the order of rotations in the context of gyroscopic motion, specifically addressing the sequence of precession, nutation, and spin. Participants explore the implications of this order on problem-solving in dynamics, particularly in relation to a specific example involving a rotating disk and axle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the established order of rotations in gyroscopic motion, asking why the spin of the body is modeled last and whether the problem could be approached differently.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of a fixed "order of rotations," suggesting that a top can be understood as a rigid body with three degrees of freedom, where the momentary rotation is defined by a unit vector and an angle, rather than a strict sequence.
  • The same participant emphasizes that the concept of an "order of rotations" may not apply universally and that understanding the motion of a top requires considering its degrees of freedom rather than a linear sequence of rotations.
  • A reference to A. Sommerfeld's work is provided as a resource for a thorough treatment of the spinning top, indicating a suggestion for further reading on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and validity of a specific order of rotations in gyroscopic motion. There is no consensus on whether the order is essential or if the motion can be understood without it.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of rotational dynamics and the potential for multiple interpretations of rotational sequences. The specific problem referenced may have limitations in its assumptions and the definitions of rotation being used.

Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR
What is the order of the rotations
Hello

I attach a picture of a problem from a dynamics textbook.

The axle rotates about the axis AB

WHILE (and the "while" here is a significant word to my question) it does that, the disk spins about an axis through C, but perpendicular to the face of the disk.

As the textbooks solve problems like this (and, in this example, despite the title of this post, there is no nutation, but an induced moment -- which is not relevant to this question), they state that the FIRST rotation is the one about AB. Then, AFTER that, we have the spin.

My question is: why that order?

Can one solve the problem by first modeling the body spin, and then, after that, the axle spin?

I can relate this to the subject line, by asking "how do we KNOW that the order of rotations in gyroscope is: precession, nutation, spin?"

-------------------------

Actually, I will answer this myself (I just took the time to think).

If I modeled the spin first, then the LOCAL axis of that body (AB) would no longer be along AB, but it will have spun. Then, it will be a different problem.

OK, I can see that. But I used this problem because the bigger issue for me is the order of rotations in the gyroscope. So, for a gyro, why do we model the rotations in that order (spin of the body being last)?
 

Attachments

  • ROTATIONS.PNG
    ROTATIONS.PNG
    27.7 KB · Views: 188
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Trying2Learn said:
Can one solve the problem
What problem ?
 
The problem seems to be the strange idea there was "an order of rotations". A top is most simply seen as a rigid body which is free to rotate around a fixed point (which is not exactly the problem according to the attached figure, which is more restricted, but it's good to understand the simple case first, and it's not simple at all anyway). It's motion is of course a rotation around the point, and it is described by three degrees of freedom. To understand this note that the momentary rotation can be described by a unit vector ##\vec{n}## defining the momentary axis of rotation and the rotation angle around this axis. For the unit vector you need two angles to describe its location relative to the space-fixed coordinate system. So all together you have three degrees of freedom of rotation. There is just this momentary rotation but no "order of rotations".

For a very thorough and as elementary as possible treatment of the spinning top, see

A. Sommerfeld, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (Mechanics).
 
vanhees71 said:
The problem seems to be the strange idea there was "an order of rotations". A top is most simply seen as a rigid body which is free to rotate around a fixed point (which is not exactly the problem according to the attached figure, which is more restricted, but it's good to understand the simple case first, and it's not simple at all anyway). It's motion is of course a rotation around the point, and it is described by three degrees of freedom. To understand this note that the momentary rotation can be described by a unit vector ##\vec{n}## defining the momentary axis of rotation and the rotation angle around this axis. For the unit vector you need two angles to describe its location relative to the space-fixed coordinate system. So all together you have three degrees of freedom of rotation. There is just this momentary rotation but no "order of rotations".

For a very thorough and as elementary as possible treatment of the spinning top, see

A. Sommerfeld, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (Mechanics).
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
975
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K