Orders of products of group elements.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sairalouise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the orders of products of group elements, specifically examining the relationship between the order of the element \( ab(a^{-1}) \) and the order of \( b \) in group theory. Participants explore various properties of group elements, including implications of associativity and specific group properties.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to show that the order of \( ab(a^{-1}) \) equals the order of \( b \) by manipulating group elements and using properties of group operations.
  • Another participant questions the validity of applying exponentiation to group elements, specifically whether \( (ab)^x = (a^x)(b^x) \) holds true in groups.
  • A different participant suggests using the property of associativity to demonstrate that \( (ab(a^{-1}))^n = e \) for some integer \( n \), indicating a potential relationship between the orders of \( ab(a^{-1}) \) and \( b \).
  • Further exploration involves defining the orders \( o(aba^{-1}) = m \) and \( o(b) = n \), leading to a conclusion that \( n \) divides \( m \) and vice versa, suggesting \( n = m \).
  • Several participants present an exercise regarding a group \( G \) where \( (ab)^2 = a^2 b^2 \), with attempts to show that \( G \) is Abelian through various algebraic manipulations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of group properties and the manipulation of group elements. There is no consensus on the validity of certain assumptions or the correctness of the approaches taken, particularly concerning the exponentiation of group elements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the rules governing indices in group theory, indicating a need for clarification on how these rules differ from those in standard arithmetic. The discussion also highlights various approaches to proving properties of groups without resolving the underlying assumptions or steps involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying abstract algebra, particularly those grappling with the concepts of group orders and properties of group operations.

sairalouise
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm looking to show that:
Order (ab(a^-1)) = Order b
So far...
Let x be order of ab(a^-1), so we have:
e = (ab(a^-1)^x)
= (a^x)(b^x)(a^(x-1))
= (a^x)(b^x)((a^-1)^x) so by associativity we have...
= (a^x)((a^-1)^x)(b^x)
= (((a)(a^-1))^x)(b^x)
= (e^x)(b^x)
= b^x
Hence x is the order of b aswell.
Im really not sure of how indices work with group elements, is it the same as with actual numbers? ie does (ab)^x = (a^x)(b^x) in groups? I am not sure it does!
Any help greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sairalouise said:
Im really not sure of how indices work with group elements, is it the same as with actual numbers? ie does (ab)^x = (a^x)(b^x) in groups? I am not sure it does!
Exercise: Suppose G is a group with the property that, for all a and b, [itex](ab)^2 = a^2 b^2[/itex]. Show that G is Abelian.
 
Let n be the order of [itex]a b (a^-1)[/itex]. Then
[tex](a b a^{-1})^n = (a b a^{-1}) (a b a^{-1}) \cdots (a b a^{-1}) = e[/tex]

(Hint: use that the group multiplication is associative -- i.e. you can put the brackets differently!)
 
Let [tex]o(aba^{-1})=m, o(b)=n[/tex] So it follows that :[tex](aba^{-1})^m=e, b^n=e[/tex]

now let's consider the following

[tex][aba^{-1}]^n=aa^{-1}(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})...*(aba^{-1})=a(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)*...*b*a^{-1}=[/tex]


[tex]ab^na^{-1}=a*e*a^{-1}=e=> m|n[/tex]

Now:

[tex]b^m=e*b*e*b*e*b*e*...*b*e=(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)*b*...*(a^{-1}a)*b*(a^{-1}a)=[/tex]

[tex]=a^{-1}*(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})*(aba^{-1})*...*(aba^{-1})*a=a^{-1}*(aba^{-1})^m*a=a^{-1}*e*a=e=>n|m[/tex]

Now since n|m and m|n => n=m what we had to prove.

P.S. This was in one of my recent exams in abstract! How would you rank such a problem in an exam in a first undergrad course in abstract algebra?
 
Last edited:
Hurkyl said:
Exercise: Suppose G is a group with the property that, for all a and b, [itex](ab)^2 = a^2 b^2[/itex]. Show that G is Abelian.

Suppose G is a group with the property that, for all a and b, [itex](ab)^2 = a^2 b^2[/itex]. Show that G is Abelian.

Let [tex]x,y \in G[/tex] we want to show that [tex]xy=yx ?[/tex]

[tex]x(yx)y=(xy)(xy)=(xy)^2=x^2y^2=(xx)(yy)=x(xy)y[/tex] So:

[tex]x(yx)y=x(xy)y /*y^{-1}=> x(yx)yy^{-1}=x(xy)yy^{-1}=>x(yx)=x(xy)[/tex]

Now multiplying by the inverse of x from the left we get:

[tex]x^{-1}*\x(yx)=x(xy)=>x^{-1}x(yx)=x^{-1}x(xy)=>yx=xy[/tex]

So, since x,y were arbitrary, we conclude that G is abelian.

Nice exercise!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K