Ordinary light and monochromatic light

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary
Ordinary light consists of rays with varying wavelengths that vibrate in all possible planes perpendicular to the direction of propagation, while monochromatic light contains rays of a single wavelength vibrating in different planes. Ordinary light can be split into a spectrum using a prism due to its multiple wavelengths, whereas monochromatic light produces a single deflection angle. The discussion clarifies that light is fundamentally a wave, with its behavior described through rays in geometrical optics, and that light can be polarized or unpolarized regardless of being monochromatic or polychromatic. The composition of light involves electromagnetic waves, where the electric and magnetic fields oscillate perpendicularly to each other and the direction of propagation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the nature of light and its interactions.
  • #31
For each SINGLE ray/photon/wave - whatever we decide to call it - fields vibrate in such a way that B is perpendicular to E and both are perpendicular to K. But if we take collimated light (that is, all have the same K) it doesn't mean B of one photon is parallel to B of another photon - they can be at any angle. We can filter the light to separate all photons of parallel Bs (this will also make their Es parallel) - that will be what we call polarized light.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32
Can you post the picture of electromagnetic wave vibrations in case of light? I tried to find it but failed.
 
  • #33
What is wrong with the one you posted? It looks perfectly OK to me.
 
  • #34
Borek said:
What is wrong with the one you posted? It looks perfectly OK to me.
But these vibrations aren't in all possible planes perpendicular the direction of wave propagation (vector K)
 
  • #35
gracy said:
But these vibrations aren't in all possible planes perpendicular the direction of wave propagation (vector K)

Well, you liked the post where I have explained what is going on:

Borek said:
For each SINGLE ray/photon/wave - whatever we decide to call it - fields vibrate in such a way that B is perpendicular to E and both are perpendicular to K.

This is a picture of a single photon, you have quite a number of photons moving in the same direction, every one with its own E/B fields perpendicular to each other, but not parallel to the fields of other photons. While technically it is possible to draw a thousand photons, each at its own angle, such a picture won't be in any way better.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
  • #36
Borek said:
every one with its own E/B fields perpendicular to each other
And also perpendicular to the direction of motion of wave.
 
  • #37
You need to watch the Cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson and understand that these discoveries were paramount in the evolution of science. The wave theory was "seen" by Isaac Newton by splitting light with a prism, and infrared was discovery by accident by Herschel (control thermometer). The true nature of spectroscopy wasn't discovery until Fraunhofer magnified the spectrum, seeing the gaps between the spectral colors and to his amazement seeing a code in nature on an elemental level. On the other side, Faraday discovered the effect electromagnetism had on light (observed light pass through glass, a dielectric while creating a magnetic field), which was later backed mathematically by Maxwell. Later Einstein's Nobel prize work on the photoelectric effect put all of this work together and boom, solar panels 50 years later!

"Just as there's a gap between observing something and knowing how it works, there's a gap between knowing how something works and being able to do anything useful with it. "-https://[URL='http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/09/einstein-didnt-win-a-nobel-for-relativity-he-won-it-for-this/380451/']www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/09/einstein-didnt-win-a-nobel-for-relativity-he-won-it-for-this/380451/[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Gracy,
maybe the analogy to sound is helpful. Sound is also propagating waves. If you press just one key on a piano, you will get approximately a "monochromatic" wave. If you play an accord, this corresponds to polychromatic light (Btw. note, that "chromatic" has a completely different meaning in music). White light is best compared to the noise coming off a radio which is not set to some radio station. So there are lots of frequencies or sound wavelength whose intensity changes quite erratically. In air, the sound waves are just compressions and expansions of the air, so sound waves have no polarisation. In solids, there can also be transversally polarised sound, i.e., the medium is shifted perpendicularly to the propagation direction, just like when you wiggle a rope. Light, at least in air or vacuum, is always perpendicularly polarised. In former times, people thought that electromagnetic waves are carried by a medium too, which they called aether, but gradually they found out, that no such medium exists and that what oscillates in light is the strenght of electric and magnetic fields.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
1K