Organic chemistry, naming cycloalkenes

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the naming conventions for cycloalkenes, specifically focusing on the correct IUPAC name for a compound with substituents on a cyclopentene ring. The scope includes homework-related queries and the application of IUPAC rules in organic chemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the correct name should be 3-fluoro-2-methyl cyclopentene instead of 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene.
  • Another participant cites IUPAC rules stating that in cycloalkenes, the double bond carbons are assigned ring locations #1 and #2, with the nearest substituent rule determining which carbon is #1.
  • Several participants discuss the numbering of the carbons in the cyclopentene ring, with one asserting that if the top carbon is #1 and counted clockwise, the substituents will be positioned accordingly.
  • A later reply acknowledges the clarification provided by another participant, agreeing that the name should indeed be 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene.
  • One participant adds that if the top carbon is taken as #1 and counted counter-clockwise, it could lead to an alternative name, 4-fluoro-5-methyl cyclopentene, but the nearest substituent rule clarifies the correct naming.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct naming of the compound, with some initially proposing one name and others providing reasoning that leads to a consensus on 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene. However, the discussion also reveals alternative interpretations based on the application of IUPAC rules, indicating that some disagreement remains.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of understanding IUPAC rules and the implications of numbering in cycloalkenes, but does not resolve all potential ambiguities in naming conventions.

TheRedDevil18
Messages
406
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



organic.jpg


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Shouldnt the name for that be 3-fluoro-2-methyl cyclopentene instead of 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene ?, if not can someone explain to me why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the IUPAC rules:
In cycloalkenes the double bond carbons are assigned ring locations #1 and #2. Which of the two is #1 may be determined by the nearest substituent rule.
 
The carbon at the top, on the tip of the pentagon, because if you number clockwise from that carbon the methyl will be on the second carbon and the fluoroide on the third.
 
TheRedDevil18 said:
The carbon at the top, on the tip of the pentagon, because if you number clockwise from that carbon the methyl will be on the second carbon and the fluoroide on the third.
Did you read the rule? Let me quote again: the double bond carbons are assigned ring locations #1 and #2. If you number the top carbon #1, then you have to go counter-clockwise for the other double-bond carbon to be #2.
 
DrClaude said:
Did you read the rule? Let me quote again: the double bond carbons are assigned ring locations #1 and #2. If you number the top carbon #1, then you have to go counter-clockwise for the other double-bond carbon to be #2.

Oh, I see it now, so it should definitely be 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene. Thanks for making it more clearer :approve:
 
Just to add a further point of detail: if you take the top C to be #1 and go counter-clockwise, you get 4-fluoro-5-methyl cyclopentene. The nearest substituent rule then tells you to set the top C to #2 and count clockwise to get 4-fluoro-3-methyl cyclopentene.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K