Orientability of Complex Manifolds.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Manifolds
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the orientability of complex manifolds, exploring the relationship between complex structures and properties of the general linear group GL(n;C). Participants examine the implications of the determinant map and the nature of transitions between charts in the context of complex and real manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the connectedness of GL(n;C) implies the determinant map must be consistently positive or negative, but questions arise regarding the meaning of positivity in the complex context.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the determinant can take any non-zero complex value, this does not lead to disconnectedness as it would with real numbers.
  • A participant seeks to understand how properties of GL(n;C) can demonstrate the orientability of complex manifolds.
  • It is proposed that a manifold is orientable if chart transitions can be chosen to be orientation-preserving, with holomorphic maps fulfilling this requirement.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of orientability in the case of multiple complex variables compared to the single complex variable scenario.
  • One participant introduces the idea of relating the orientability of a complex n-manifold to that of its corresponding real 2n-manifold obtained by "decomplexifying" it.
  • A suggestion is made to consider the standard embedding of GL(n,C) into GL(2n,R) as a relevant perspective.
  • Another participant argues that the tangent bundle of a complex manifold has a complex structure, and that any complex vector space has a canonical orientation, which is independent of the choice of basis due to the path-connectedness of GL(n;C).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the determinant map in the context of complex manifolds and the clarity of orientability in multiple complex variables. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which complex manifolds can be shown to be orientable.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of defining positivity in the context of complex numbers and the implications of transitioning between complex and real manifolds. There are also unresolved questions about the relationship between orientability in complex and real dimensions.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, everyone: I am trying to show that any complex manifold is orientable.


I know this has to see with properties of Gl(n;C) (C complexes, of course.) ;


specifically, with Gl(n;C) being connected (as a Lie Group.). Now this means

that the determinant map must be either always pos. or always negative, but

I am not clear on why it is not always negative.


Also, I am confused about the fact that the determinant may be complex-valued,

so that it does not make sense to say it is positive or negative.


Any Ideas.?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With regard to GL(n,C):

The determinant still can be anything except for 0. Except in this case 'anything' means any complex number instead of any real number like you're probably more familiar with. So with real numbers, if you remove zero you get two disconnected sets. If you just remove 0 from the complex plane you're left with a set that is still connected
 
Thanks. So how can I then show that complex manifolds are orientable.?.

I had been told that properties of Gl(n;C) gave the answer, but I cannot see

why/how.
 
Manifold is orientable if and only if the chart transitions can be chosen to be orientation-preserving (i.e. Jacobian positive). Holomorphic maps certainly do that.
 
I can see that for one complex variable, where we can may be use conformality,
but it does not seem so clear for many complex variables.

I also wonder if we're given a complex n-manifold N, if the orientability of N is
equivalent to the orientability of the equivalent real 2n-manifold that we get by
"decomplexifying" N.
 
Think of the standard embedding of GL(n,C) into GL(2n,R).
 
I think this works.

- the tangent bundle of a complex manifold has a complex structure. This is because the coordinate charts lie in GL(n:C)

any complex vector space has a canonical orientation. Choose any basis x1, x2, ..., xn and extend it to a real basis, x1 ix1 x2 ix2, ...xn ixn. This ordering defines an orientation of the underlying real vector space. The choice is independent of the choice of basis x1 ... xn because GL(n;C) is path connected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K