Does Pipe Size Reduction Affect Flow Rate and Pressure Drop Significantly?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of pipe size reduction on flow rate and pressure drop, specifically transitioning from a 1/2" pipe to a 1/4" adapter for a 9/16" flow switch. Calculations indicate a pressure drop of 0.15 psi with a resistance coefficient of 30.68, while maintaining a volume flow of 2 l/min. The flow remains turbulent, with Reynolds numbers of 3330 and 6661 for the respective pipe sizes. The formula for head loss due to sudden contraction is also provided, allowing for further analysis of pressure differences required to sustain flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number calculations
  • Knowledge of pressure drop calculations in piping systems
  • Experience with flow rate measurement techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Fluid dynamics and pressure drop calculations" for deeper insights
  • Explore "Reynolds number significance in flow regimes" to understand flow behavior
  • Learn about "Head loss calculations in piping systems" for practical applications
  • Investigate "Flow rate optimization techniques in hydraulic systems" for improved performance
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics students, and professionals involved in hydraulic system design and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

JJ1989
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
0http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/946493/solve-for-pressure-drop-across-and-orifice#
I'm running 1/2" pipe but the only way to connect a 9/16" flow switch is with a 1/4" adapter. I'd have to go from 1/2" down to 1/4" to the 9/16" flow switch down to 1/4" back to 1/2".

I was wondering if this would cause a large pressure drop but I used this online calculator and was wondering if anyone could verify these numbers:

Calculation output

Flow medium: Water 20 °C / liquid

Volume flow: 2 l/min

Weight density: 998.206 kg/m³

Dynamic Viscosity: 1001.61 10-6 kg/ms

Element of pipe: Orifice sharp-edged

Dimensions of element: Diameter of pipe D1: .5 in.

Diameter of pipe D2: .25 in.

Velocity of flow: 0.86 ft./s

Reynolds number: 3330

Velocity of flow 2: 3.45 ft./s

Reynolds number 2: 6661

Flow: turbulent

Absolute roughness:

Pipe friction number:

Resistance coefficient: 30.68

Resist.coeff.branching pipe: -

Press.drop branch.pipe: -

Pressure drop: 22.14 lbw./sq.ft.

0.15 psi

I've also looked at a flow rate calculator and was wondering if the down size in the piping would affect the flow rate substantially? I'm really trying to stay at 2L/min.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
JJ1989 said:
0http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/946493/solve-for-pressure-drop-across-and-orifice#
I'm running 1/2" pipe but the only way to connect a 9/16" flow switch is with a 1/4" adapter. I'd have to go from 1/2" down to 1/4" to the 9/16" flow switch down to 1/4" back to 1/2".

I was wondering if this would cause a large pressure drop but I used this online calculator and was wondering if anyone could verify these numbers:

Calculation output

Flow medium: Water 20 °C / liquid

Volume flow: 2 l/min

Weight density: 998.206 kg/m³

Dynamic Viscosity: 1001.61 10-6 kg/ms

Element of pipe: Orifice sharp-edged

Dimensions of element: Diameter of pipe D1: .5 in.

Diameter of pipe D2: .25 in.

Velocity of flow: 0.86 ft./s

Reynolds number: 3330

Velocity of flow 2: 3.45 ft./s

Reynolds number 2: 6661

Flow: turbulent

Absolute roughness:

Pipe friction number:

Resistance coefficient: 30.68

Resist.coeff.branching pipe: -

Press.drop branch.pipe: -

Pressure drop: 22.14 lbw./sq.ft.

0.15 psi

I've also looked at a flow rate calculator and was wondering if the down size in the piping would affect the flow rate substantially? I'm really trying to stay at 2L/min.
Head Loss due to sudden contraction or sudden expansion in area of flow is given by the formula,
hL = (Vs2/2g)×{1-(As/Al)}2
where the subscripts 's' and 'l' denote the flow properties at the smaller area region and the larger area region respectively.
Substitute the values in this equation and you can determine how much extra pressure difference needs to be created to maintain the same flow as the case when there was no variation in area of flow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K