Origin of Cosmic Rays: Intensity Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intensity of cosmic rays is highest at approximately 20 km above Earth's surface, where secondary muons are generated from collisions between primary cosmic rays and atmospheric atoms. Experimental studies confirm that as altitude increases beyond this point, the intensity of cosmic rays decreases due to a lower concentration of atmospheric atoms, resulting in fewer collisions and thus fewer muons. Primary cosmic rays originate from space, and their detection on Earth primarily involves secondary cosmic rays produced in the atmosphere. This phenomenon highlights the relationship between altitude and cosmic ray intensity, contradicting any claims that cosmic rays originate more from Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic ray physics
  • Knowledge of atmospheric composition and behavior
  • Familiarity with particle interactions in high-energy physics
  • Basic principles of ionization and radiation detection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of cosmic ray production and detection
  • Study the effects of altitude on particle collision rates
  • Explore the role of muons in cosmic ray experiments
  • Investigate the atmospheric conditions affecting cosmic ray intensity
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, atmospheric scientists, and anyone interested in the origins and behavior of cosmic rays in relation to Earth's atmosphere.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
we all know the cosmic rays comes from outer surface of the Earth from higher altitudes and enter the Earth's atmosphere in all directions. but experimental studies have revealed that intensity of cosmic rays increases with altitude and reaches a maximum at about 20 km above Earth surface and above that altitude , the intensity decreases. cosmic rays, being high energetic, comes from outer surface but its intensity is less at higher altitudes above 20 km. what is the reason for this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Most of the cosmic rays you detect eg. as noise in CCDs are muons created in the atmosphere when higher energy particles form space hit atoms

At low altitudes these secondary muons will have been absorbed by hitting other atoms, at very high altitudes there aren't enough atmospheric atoms to be hit by high energy particles and so fewer muons are generated.
 
Any notion that cosmic rays originate more from Earth than anywhere else seriously conflicts with observational evidence.
 
thanks nobody special for your explanation
 
Just to make Chronos' point clear.
Primary cosmic rays originate in space. When they enter the atmosphere they collide with atoms in the atmosphere and make a whole shower of secondary cosmic rays, it's these secondary rays that you mostly detect and have a characteristic height profile.
 
That's the area of accumulated energy problem.
Actually the cosmic ray intensity is high in the space.
But accumulated amount of the ionized particle is high around ~ 20km altitude.

--- high altitude area very low moleclular concentration, collison possiblity very low
.
.
--- middle altitude area low molecular concentraiton , collision probability is high
.........(high amount of ionic atoms exist)
.
--- low altitude area very high molecular concentraion, low amount cosmic ray reached from the space
.
That's the amount of accumulated high energy particle problem.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
940
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
975
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K