Origin of the Solar System: Understanding Hydrogen & Heavy Elements

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origin of the solar system, specifically addressing the composition of the sun and planets, the distribution of hydrogen and heavy elements, and the gravitational dynamics involved in their formation. Participants explore theories related to nebular formation and the subsequent development of the solar system's structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the nebular theory, suggesting that the solar system originated from a cloud of gas and dust, with the sun forming at the center and planets condensing from the surrounding material.
  • One participant notes that the sun is primarily composed of hydrogen, which is abundant compared to heavier elements, and mentions that gas giant planets also predominantly consist of hydrogen.
  • Another participant questions why heavy elements like iron are found in Earth but not in the sun, suggesting that gravitational forces in the nebula should have concentrated these elements at the center.
  • Some argue that the presence of heavy elements in the inner planets could be due to the loss of lighter elements like hydrogen over time, influenced by solar wind.
  • One participant posits that the planets formed from localized eddies of matter within the collapsing nebula, rather than everything collapsing into the sun.
  • Another participant speculates that if heavier elements were homogeneously distributed in the original nebula, the density differences in the inner planets might be due to lighter elements being expelled by the sun's influence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the distribution of elements in the solar system and the processes involved in planet formation. There is no consensus on the reasons for the observed composition of the sun and planets, and multiple competing explanations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight uncertainties regarding the gravitational dynamics in the early solar system and the effects of solar wind on the retention of lighter elements. The discussion reflects a range of hypotheses without resolving the underlying questions.

johnmtb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear All,I understand that one of the most popular theories concerning the origin of the solar system begins with cloud of gas and dust (called a nebula), assumed to be the remnants of a supernova; in order to explain elements such as iron and above.That this nebula begins to flatten into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center, with the bulge forming the sun and with the various planets condensing out of the rest of the pancake. All of this I can understand and accept.However, why is the sun composed mostly of hydrogen and not the denser elements such as iron and above, which should have headed to the center of the solar system, due to gravitational forces, the same way they did when Earth condensed?Is there any theory on why the sun does not contain the heavy elements and the planets the gaseous elements or or gas molecules?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There simply is a lot more hydrogen than everything else - a LOT more.
Not only the Sun, but the gas giant planets are predominantly hydrogen.
The sun probably does contain minute traces of heavier elements.
 
johnmtb said:
Dear All,I understand that one of the most popular theories concerning the origin of the solar system begins with cloud of gas and dust (called a nebula), assumed to be the remnants of a supernova; in order to explain elements such as iron and above.That this nebula begins to flatten into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center, with the bulge forming the sun and with the various planets condensing out of the rest of the pancake. All of this I can understand and accept.However, why is the sun composed mostly of hydrogen and not the denser elements such as iron and above, which should have headed to the center of the solar system, due to gravitational forces, the same way they did when Earth condensed?Is there any theory on why the sun does not contain the heavy elements and the planets the gaseous elements or or gas molecules?

http://chemistry.about.com/od/geochemistry/a/sunelements.htm

From above:
Elements in the Sun

Element % of total atoms % of total mass
Hydrogen 91.2 71.0
Helium 8.7 27.1
Oxygen 0.078 0.97
Carbon 0.043 0.40
Nitrogen 0.0088 0.096
Silicon 0.0045 0.099
Magnesium 0.0038 0.076
Neon 0.0035 0.058
Iron 0.030 0.014
Sulfur 0.015 0.040
 
thank you mathman, but it still does not explain why the earth, at least, has so much iron, etc., or why when we go beyond Mars we run into the gas giants.

gravity forces in the original nebula should have brought all of the heavy elements to the centre of the solar system, while it was still in the particulate stage.
 
johnmtb said:
gravity forces in the original nebula should have brought all of the heavy elements t

Not if they are in orbit. The same argument can be applied to the Earth today, right?
 
johnmtb said:
thank you mathman, but it still does not explain why the earth, at least, has so much iron, etc., or why when we go beyond Mars we run into the gas giants.
The rocky inner planets probably did have thicker atmosphere including a lot of hydrogen in the earliest stages of formation.
Free hydrogen though, being very light is easily pushed away over time by solar wind leaving the remaining 10% of heavier material to agglomerate.
In the case of gas giants, their much greater gravity enabled them to hold on to more of the initial hydrogen
 
Guys,

thank you all for your responses. however, I am still not certain that the question has been answered. I shall always feel that there is something amiss with the current theory.
 
  • #10
In a sense what you are saying is 'why are there planets?, why didn't everything simply just collapse into a central star?
Well in fact most of the nebula, over 99% of it, did just that.
The planets and other smaller bodies formed from relatively small localised eddies of matter within the broadly collapsing disk of material.
 
  • #11
rootone,

maybe that is the answer. assuming that the heavier elements were homogenous in the original nebula, and mercury, venus, Earth and Mars are only more dense because the lighter elements have been blown away by the sun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K