Origin Story Of The First Proteins

In summary: Its always fun to spit out self made hypotheses !In summary, RNA was capable of catalyzing peptide synthesis in prebiotic times. This led to the development of the "RNA world" hypothesis, which posits that life began as self-replicating RNA molecules.
  • #1
Navin
112
34
Now i had a question,but before that look at this.

Now by the central dogma
DNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase onto mRNA and this leads to translation which creates Protiens.

But hold on...The polymerase itself is an enzyme ie ;a protein .

So to make proteins...you need proteins aldredy present in the body...so

How did the first proteins ever come to be !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #4
Navin said:
So what are your opinions.
I would note that the minimum "bootstrap" s some thing that can:
1) Holds information (at least thousands of bits);
2) Will self-replicate - even given months or years and a very favorable environment.
3) Can evolve.

So the initial biology may not have had anything as luxurious as RNA, DNA, or mRNA. There may be other information carriers that go unrecognized because they as so inefficient.

Since the OP wants "opinions" (aka, speculation), should this stay under the "Biology" heading?
 
  • Like
Likes Navin
  • #5
.Scott said:
I would note that the minimum "bootstrap" s some thing that can:
1) Holds information (at least thousands of bits);
2) Will self-replicate - even given months or years and a very favorable environment.
3) Can evolve.

So the initial biology may not have had anything as luxurious as RNA, DNA, or mRNA. There may be other information carriers that go unrecognized because they as so inefficient.
Thats an exccelant point.
 
  • #6
@Navin
Its always fun to spit out self made hypotheses !

No! It is okay on Reddit. Not here. We are an educational site, not meant for speculation, so please do not hypothesize from ignorance, just cite known research.

And no, @.Scott. This thread is going for a one way trip to general discussion. And if becomes too speculative the mentors there will take additional action.
 
  • #7
Navin said:
im not satisfied with the usual "no one knows answer"

Too bad. In science, if we don't know, we say we don't know. We don't make stuff up.
 
  • #8
Navin said:
Its always fun to spit out self made hypotheses !

You might want to read the PF Rules that you had agreed to before you have way too much fun.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes ZeGato
  • #9
RNA is capable of catalyzing reactions, no need for proteins.
 
  • Like
Likes Navin
  • #10
Navin said:
Now i had a question,but before that look at this.

Now by the central dogma
DNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase onto mRNA and this leads to translation which creates Protiens.

But hold on...The polymerase itself is an enzyme ie ;a protein .

So to make proteins...you need proteins aldredy present in the body...so

How did the first proteins ever come to be !

Protein synthesis occurs on the ribosome, and while the modern ribosome does contain protein, protein synthesis seems to be catalyzed only by RNA. So, it is plausible in prebiotic times, protein synthesis (or at least peptide synthesis) was catalyzed by RNA.

In fact, as others in this thread have alluded to, RNA is a very versatile molecule capable of both storing genetic information (e.g. many modern viruses like the influenza virus store their genetic information as RNA) as well as serving as catalysts (ribozymes). These facts led scientists to come up with the "RNA world" hypothesis, which envisions that life began as self-replicating RNA molecules. To demonstrate the feasibility of this hypothesis, scientists have been making attempts at engineering self-replicating RNAs in the lab (see, for example, this PF thread discussing the topic: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/amplification-of-rna-by-an-rna-polymerase-ribozyme.882293/).

For some speculation about the origin of proteins, see my post here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-did-proteins-evolve.927139/#post-5852459

See this PF thread for more discussion of theories around abiogenesis: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/which-was-the-origin-dna-rna-or-protein.562096/
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Navin and jim mcnamara
  • #11
Okay
jim mcnamara said:
@NavinNo! It is okay on Reddit. Not here. We are an educational site, not meant for speculation, so please do not hypothesize from ignorance, just cite known research.

And no, @.Scott. This thread is going for a one way trip to general discussion. And if becomes too speculative the mentors there will take additional action.

Vanadium 50 said:
Too bad. In science, if we don't know, we say we don't know. We don't make stuff up.
On secand thought let not continue this.

They are right.
This is afterall an education site and speculations may mislead someone who has no idea about what's going on

So let's end it at " We don't know"

Science is absolute and can't dwell into fantasy.

But i still feel we can't just take such stuff for granted though.
We can't just always say "we don't know" and neither do i think people should supress opinions.
There is an answer out there and there are bright minds with fancy degrees on this site.
 
  • #12
Navin said:
There is an answer out there and there are bright minds with fancy degrees

And you can be sure they are not wasting their time, but researching :smile: Just because they don't know as of yet doesn't mean they will not make progress. There is no guarantee we will know everything though.
 
  • #13
Wait a minute since this thread has been shifted to general discussion (atleast thsts what my device tells me) is it now safe to continue speculations ?
jim mcnamara said:
@NavinNo! It is okay on Reddit. Not here. We are an educational site, not meant for speculation, so please do not hypothesize from ignorance, just cite known research.

And no, @.Scott. This thread is going for a one way trip to general discussion. And if becomes too speculative the mentors there will take additional action.

Im kinda new actually...
 
  • #14
Navin said:
is it now safe to continue speculations ?

No.
 
  • #15
Fine..fine...(looks enviously at those darn Reddit users)
[IT WAS A JOKE ! A JOKE ! Noo don't ban me noo-"]
 

What is the origin story of the first proteins?

The origin story of the first proteins is still a topic of debate among scientists. However, the most widely accepted theory is that the first proteins were formed through a process called abiogenesis, where simple organic molecules combined to form more complex molecules.

How were the first proteins formed?

The first proteins were formed through a process called polymerization, where small amino acids combined to form long chains. These chains then folded and interacted with each other to form functional proteins.

What were the first proteins like?

The first proteins were likely very simple and consisted of only a few amino acids. They did not have specific shapes or functions like modern proteins, but they were essential for the development of early life.

What role did the first proteins play in the development of life?

The first proteins played a crucial role in the development of life. They were the building blocks of more complex molecules like DNA, and they also had important functions in early cellular processes such as metabolism and replication.

How do scientists study the origin of proteins?

Scientists study the origin of proteins through a combination of laboratory experiments and computer simulations. They also analyze the genetic sequences of modern proteins to trace their evolutionary history and infer information about the first proteins.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top