Orthochronous transformations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter myleo727
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
myleo727
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How can one show that if det A = 1 and the 00th component of A > = 1 then A preserves the sign of the time component of time-like vectors? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: write out the terms of the time component of the transformed vector. You need to show this doesn't change sign.

A helpful relation is:

[tex] \Lambda^\mu_{\ \alpha}\Lambda^\nu_{\ \beta}\eta^{\alpha\beta}=\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Use the definition of matrix multiplication on [itex](\Lambda x)_{00}[/itex] (row 0, column 0 of the matrix [itex]\Lambda x[/itex]). (Forget you ever even heard of tensors. This problem involves matrices and their components, nothing else). You need to translate the assumption that x is timelike to a relationship between its components, and use it.

I think you also need to know what I said about the velocity of a Lorentz transformation in this post. If you don't, you're going to have to prove algebraically that this velocity is <1 (using the condition in Daverz's post, which I prefer to write as [itex]\Lambda^T\eta\Lambda=\eta[/itex]).

You also need to understand the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for vectors in [itex]\mathbb R^3[/itex] with the standard inner product.

If you get stuck, show us where.