B Orthogonal Projections: Same Thing or Not?

Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
TL;DR
Why is the orthogonal projection formula written as ##P_A=A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T## as opposed to ##P_A=(A^T)^{-1}A^T##?
Physics news on Phys.org
##\left(A^\tau\right)^{-1}\left(A\right)^\tau=1## which doesn't mean a lot. ##A\left(A^\tau A\right)^{-1}A^\tau=1## which is also meaningless. A projection is generally a transformation for which ##A^2=A## holds.
 
You can't simplify ##(A^TA)^{-1}=A^{-1}(A^T)^{-1}## since ##A## is not a square matrix.

@fresh_42 I think ##A## is a matrix whose columns form a basis for the subspace of the projection, not the projection matrix itself.
 
Infrared said:
You can't simplify (ATA)−1=A−1(AT)−1 since A is not a square matrix.
Ah, that's what I was missing. Ok, thank you.
 
Infrared said:
@fresh_42 I think A is a matrix whose columns form a basis for the subspace of the projection, not the projection matrix itself.
And yes. I see though that it would all be meaningless if they were invertible matrices, as then the span of A would be all of ##\mathbb{R}^n##, and a vector in ##\mathbb{R}^n##'s projection onto ##\mathbb{R}^n## is just itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
2K