Orthogonal unit vectors also unit vectors?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of unit vectors and their combinations, specifically focusing on whether the sums and differences of two unit vectors remain unit vectors while being orthogonal to each other.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the inner products of the vectors and their norms, questioning the conditions under which the sums and differences of unit vectors can be orthogonal and whether they remain unit vectors.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the mathematical properties of the vectors involved, with some participants suggesting different perspectives on the inner product and its implications. The discussion has not reached a consensus, as various interpretations and approaches are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumptions regarding the inner product and the implications of specific cases, such as when the vectors are equal. There is also mention of potential edits to clarify previous statements.

Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
If two vectors v, w are both unit vectors, then v+w and v-w will be orthogonal, but are v+w and v-w also unit vectors?

I would say no because the inner product of the two added, and the two subtracted would also have to be orthogonal.

<(v+w)+(v-w),(v+w)-(v-w)>

= <2v,2w>

and <2v,2w> must be greater than zero for the product to be defined in the first place.

*EDIT:
If it helps, the way I originally showed that they were orthogonal was to take
<v+w,v-w> = ||v||^2 - ||w||^2

if they are unit vectors then ||v|| = 1 and ||w|| = 1 so

<v+w,v-w> = 1 - 1 = 0 = orthogonal
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is [itex]\left|| u-v\right|| ^2[/itex] equal to ?
 
Mindscrape said:
If two vectors v, w are both unit vectors, then v+w and v-w will be orthogonal, but are v+w and v-w also unit vectors?

I would say no because the inner product of the two added, and the two subtracted would also have to be orthogonal.

<(v+w)+(v-w),(v+w)-(v-w)>

= <2v,2w>

and <2v,2w> must be greater than zero for the product to be defined in the first place.
? Are you saying that an inner product can't be negative? In any case, I see no reason for looking at <(v+w)+ (v-w),(v+w)-(v-w)> . The question was asking about v+w and v-w separately. You should be looking at
||v+w||2= <v+w,v+w> and ||v-w||2= <v-w,v-w>.

Even more simply, what if v= w?

*EDIT:
If it helps, the way I originally showed that they were orthogonal was to take
<v+w,v-w> = ||v||^2 - ||w||^2

if they are unit vectors then ||v|| = 1 and ||w|| = 1 so

<v+w,v-w> = 1 - 1 = 0 = orthogonal[/QUOTE]
 
HallsofIvy said:
? Are you saying that an inner product can't be negative? In any case, I see no reason for looking at <(v+w)+ (v-w),(v+w)-(v-w)> . The question was asking about v+w and v-w separately. You should be looking at
||v+w||2= <v+w,v+w> and ||v-w||2= <v-w,v-w>.

Even more simply, what if v= w?

Yes because if v = w, then <2v,2v> must be positive because 4<v,v> must obey positivity.

edit: whoops, I forgot the change the w at the end of my first post to v. This will work now, correct?
 
Last edited:
I suppose that in the end dex's way would be the easiest and most straightforward (since it shows the norm is zero).
 
Mindscrape said:
I suppose that in the end dex's way would be the easiest and most straightforward (since it shows the norm is zero).

ZERO!? What is zero?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K