Oscillation frequency of probability density P(x,t)

nhk150709
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If an electron is in an infinite 1-D square well of width L, how do you get oscillation frequency of the probability density for any energy state n?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nhk150709 said:
If an electron is in an infinite 1-D square well of width L, how do you get oscillation frequency of the probability density for any energy state n?

You think about the meaning of the phrase "stationary state" ... :wink:
 
SpectraCat said:
You think about the meaning of the phrase "stationary state" ... :wink:

stationary state... I didn't understand that term till I found e^iwt disappear when it is squared.

so frequency has to be 0.

Thanks ^^
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top