Oscillation of a particle on a parabolic surface [equation of motion]

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the frequency of oscillation for a particle on a parabolic surface defined by the equation $$y = Ax^2$$. The correct frequency is established as $$\omega = \sqrt{2Ag}$$, where $$g$$ is the acceleration due to gravity. Participants emphasize the importance of using energy conservation principles and the correct application of the chain rule in calculus to derive the equations of motion. The conversation highlights the distinction between two-dimensional motion on a parabolic surface and one-dimensional motion on a circular path, ultimately leading to the conclusion that a small angle approximation is necessary for accurate frequency determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically oscillatory motion.
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in physics.
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly the chain rule and differentiation.
  • Knowledge of simple harmonic motion and its mathematical representation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for particles on curved surfaces.
  • Learn about small angle approximations in oscillatory systems.
  • Explore the application of dimensional analysis in verifying physical equations.
  • Investigate the differences between oscillations in one-dimensional versus two-dimensional systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to explain complex concepts related to motion on parabolic surfaces.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
equation of motion
Relevant Equations
F = ma
##\ddot{\theta} + \frac{k}{m} x = 0##
Hi,

I have a particle on a parabolic surface $$y = Ax^2$$ and I have to show that the frequency is $$\omega = \sqrt{2Ag}$$

I don't know how to deal with a parabola. I don't think I can use the polar coordinates like a circle.

I don't see how to start this problem and in which coordinates system.

For a circle I can use the polar coordinates and then use ##F = ma => -mg sin \theta = mR\ddot{\omega}##

I have to get the equation of motion $$\ddot{\theta} + 2Ag \theta = 0$$

thus, ##2Ag = \omega^2##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EpselonZero said:
which coordinates system.
It’s straightforward enough in Cartesian.
Draw a diagram of the particle at some (x,y) and analyse the forces.
 
I think using energy ##u(y) = mgy## can get the job done. Someone pointed out to me. I didn't notice.

However, is it the only way?
 
EpselonZero said:
I think using energy ##u(y) = mgy## can get the job done.
What about KE?
 
haruspex said:
What about KE?
##y_{max}, E = mgy_{max}##

##K = E - U, \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 = mgy_{max} - mgy##

##\dot{x} = \sqrt{2g(y_{max} - Ax^2)}##

I'm stuck here, Am I in the right path?

I'm wondering if ##y_{max} = Ax_{max}^2##
 
EpselonZero said:
##\frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 = mgy_{max} - mgy##
What about ##\dot y##?
 
haruspex said:
What about ##\dot y##?
##\dot{y} = 2A\dot{x}##

##\dot{x} = \frac{\sqrt{2g}}{2A}##

That doesn't work and I can find why.
 
EpselonZero said:
##\dot{y} = 2A\dot{x}##

##\dot{x} = \frac{\sqrt{2g}}{2A}##

That doesn't work and I can find why.
No, I mean as part of the KE.
 
haruspex said:
No, I mean as part of the KE.
That's what I did.

##2A\dot{x} =\sqrt{2g} (y_{max} - y)##

##\dot{x} = \frac{\sqrt{2g}}{2A}(y_{max} - y)##
 
  • #10
EpselonZero said:
##\dot{y} = 2A\dot{x}##
That equation is wrong. You have not differentiated x2 correctly. Use the chain rule.
EpselonZero said:
##\frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 = mgy_{max} - mgy##
That equation is wrong because it omits the KE embodied in the vertical component of motion.
 
  • #11
If ## \frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^2 = mgy_{max} - mgy##

I get ##x = \frac{\sqrt{2g}}{2A}(y_{max} - y)##

or ##\dot{y} = \sqrt{2g}(y_{max} - y)##
 
  • #12
EpselonZero said:
If ## \frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^2 = mgy_{max} - mgy##
Now you are only counting the vertical component of KE. Both contribute.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
Now you are only counting the vertical component of KE. Both contribute.
Ah, I see, but how I do that.
##K = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^2 + \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2##

##U = mgy##

##E = mgy_{max} + mgx_{max}##Which gives me

##\dot{y}^2 + \dot{x}^2 = 2g(y_{max} + x_{max} - y)##

I'm not sure what to do with the left side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
EpselonZero said:
##E = mgy_{max} + myx_{max}##
I assume you meant mgxmax, but I don't understand the reason for that term. What aspect of GPE is not covered by mgy?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
E = total energy

When the particle is at ##y_{max}## then all the energy = U, thus ## E = mgy_{max}##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
EpselonZero said:
E = total energy

When the particle is at ##y_{max}## then all the energy = U, thus ## E = mgy_{max}##
Sorry, missed out a crucial word ("not") in post #14.
So, yes, ## E = mgy_{max}##.

What dynamic energy equation does that give you (instead of the one at the end of post #13), and what equation connects ##\dot y, \dot x## ( it is not ##\dot y=2A\dot x##)?
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
What dynamic energy equation does that give you (instead of the one at the end of post #13), and what equation connects ##\dot y, \dot x## ( it is not ##\dot y=2A\dot x##)?

## \dot{y}^2 + \dot{x}^2 = 2g(y_{max} - y)##

##\dot{y} = 2Ax##

##\dot{x} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{A}\sqrt{y}}##

sorry, I can't find a connection between ##\dot{x},\dot{y}##
 
  • #18
EpselonZero said:
##\dot{y} = 2Ax##
sorry, I can't find a connection between ##\dot{x},\dot{y}##
That equation is wrong. You have differentiated the LHS wrt t but the RHS wrt x. How do you differentiate Ax2 wrt t?
The relationship I am asking for is the correct form of that.
 
  • #19
I'm sorry...
##\dot{y} = A\dot{x}^2##

##\dot{y}^2 + \frac{\dot{y}}{A} = 2g(y_{max} - y)##

I can't have ##\sqrt{2Ag}##
 
  • #20
EpselonZero said:
I'm sorry...
##\dot{y} = A\dot{x}^2##
Still wrong.
Use the chain rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #21
A is a constant
##\frac{dy}{dt} = A \frac{d(x^2)}{dt}##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
EpselonZero said:
A is a constant
##\frac{dy}{dt} = A \frac{d(x^2)}{dt}##
Yes, but what do you get when you apply the chain rule to the RHS?
You've so far tried ##2Ax## and ##A\dot x^2##.
(You are familiar with the chain rule?)
 
  • #23
haruspex said:
(You are familiar with the chain rule?)

I think so, but I don't see how to use the chain rule here.
I mean, I can use the chain rule if I have something like ##\sqrt{(x^2y-xy)}##
 
  • #24
EpselonZero said:
I think so, but I don't see how to use the chain rule here.
I mean, I can use the chain rule if I have something like ##\sqrt{(x^2y-xy)}##
##\frac d{dt}f(x(t))=\frac d{dx}f.\frac d{dt}x##.
 
  • #25
x is a function?

x = x(t) ?
 
  • #26
EpselonZero said:
x is a function?

x = x(t) ?
Yes. In your problem x and y both depend on t, and there is a fixed relationship between x and y, so you can think of it as y depends on x depends on t.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #27
Alright,

##f(x) = Ax^2##

##\frac{d}{dx}f = 2Ax ##
##\frac{d}{dt}x = \dot{x}^2##

##2Ax \cdot \dot{x}^2##

Is that right?
 
  • #28
EpselonZero said:
##\frac{d}{dt}x = \dot{x}^2##
Inventive.
 
  • #29
I though if ##f(x) = Ax^2, x(t) = x^2##

why not ##x^2## ?
 
  • #30
EpselonZero said:
I though if ##f(x) = Ax^2, x(t) = x^2##
What if I were to define another function g(x)=x3? Would that suddenly make x(t) equal x3?
No, x(t) just means that x is some function of t. It doesn't tell you what the function is.
##\frac{d}{dt}x=\dot x##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K