Oscillations of a Block Mass attached to a Spring on an Incline

AI Thread Summary
The incline angle does not affect the mass component in the oscillation equation T = 2π√(m/k) because both the mass and the spring experience the same gravitational force. The equations of motion for horizontal and vertical springs demonstrate that while the equilibrium position changes due to gravity, the fundamental form of the equation remains consistent. This means that regardless of the incline, the oscillation period is determined by the mass and spring constant alone. The analysis shows that oscillations occur around the new equilibrium position rather than the spring's natural length. Thus, the period of oscillation remains unchanged across different angles of inclination.
lightlightsup
Messages
100
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
If the block is pulled slightly down the incline and released, what is the period of the resulting oscillations?
Relevant Equations
See images.
Why doesn't the incline angle play a role in changing the ##m## component of this equation?
##T = 2π\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}##

FOR QUESTION 25, PART B:
Question.png

ANSWER:

Answer.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it because even the spring is dealing with gravity on an incline?
Both, the mass and the spring are dealing with the same gravity/g, so, the equation/ratio remains the same.
 
Compare a horizontal spring to a vertical spring with mass. If there is no difference here, then there will be no difference for intermediate angles.

For a horizontal spring, the equation of motion is given by:

##m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-kx \tag{1}##

Where x is the displacement from the equilibrium position, which is the unloaded spring length, and m is the mass of the object. Now if we have a vertical spring the equation of motion is given by:

##m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-ky - mg \tag{2}##

Where y displacement from the unloaded spring length. The new equilibrium position is found by force balance with zero acceleration:

##0=-ky_{eq} - mg \rightarrow y_{eq} = -mg/k \tag{3}##

So if we plug 3 into the right hand side of 2, we get:

##-ky - mg = -k(y-mg/k) = -k(y-y_{eq}) \tag{4}##

Now using 4 in 2 gives:

##m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-k(y-y_{eq})\tag{5}##

And with a change in variables of ##x=y-y_{eq}## in 5, we have an expression identical to 1.

So, it seems that the only influence the weight of the object has is to change the equilibrium position, but that it doesn't change the equation of motion. A linear spring always oscillates about the equilibrium position, not the natural length of the spring. In the horizontal case, the equilibrium position happens to be the natural length of the spring, but not in the vertical (or inclined) case. Since the equations of motion are the same, the periods are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes lightlightsup
Brilliant analysis. THANK YOU!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top