Oscillations of a Block Mass attached to a Spring on an Incline

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the oscillation of a block mass attached to a spring on an incline, specifically addressing why the incline angle does not affect the mass component in the oscillation period equation, ##T = 2π\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}##. It concludes that both the mass and the spring experience the same gravitational force, leading to identical equations of motion regardless of the incline angle. The analysis demonstrates that the only effect of weight is to alter the equilibrium position, not the oscillation characteristics, confirming that oscillation periods remain consistent across different angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and oscillation principles
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and spring constants (k)
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations in physics
  • Concept of equilibrium positions in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the oscillation period for different spring configurations
  • Explore the effects of varying mass on oscillation frequency in spring systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of oscillations on inclined planes
  • Investigate the role of damping in oscillatory motion of springs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems and spring mechanics.

lightlightsup
Messages
100
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
If the block is pulled slightly down the incline and released, what is the period of the resulting oscillations?
Relevant Equations
See images.
Why doesn't the incline angle play a role in changing the ##m## component of this equation?
##T = 2π\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}##

FOR QUESTION 25, PART B:
Question.png

ANSWER:

Answer.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it because even the spring is dealing with gravity on an incline?
Both, the mass and the spring are dealing with the same gravity/g, so, the equation/ratio remains the same.
 
Compare a horizontal spring to a vertical spring with mass. If there is no difference here, then there will be no difference for intermediate angles.

For a horizontal spring, the equation of motion is given by:

##m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-kx \tag{1}##

Where x is the displacement from the equilibrium position, which is the unloaded spring length, and m is the mass of the object. Now if we have a vertical spring the equation of motion is given by:

##m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-ky - mg \tag{2}##

Where y displacement from the unloaded spring length. The new equilibrium position is found by force balance with zero acceleration:

##0=-ky_{eq} - mg \rightarrow y_{eq} = -mg/k \tag{3}##

So if we plug 3 into the right hand side of 2, we get:

##-ky - mg = -k(y-mg/k) = -k(y-y_{eq}) \tag{4}##

Now using 4 in 2 gives:

##m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-k(y-y_{eq})\tag{5}##

And with a change in variables of ##x=y-y_{eq}## in 5, we have an expression identical to 1.

So, it seems that the only influence the weight of the object has is to change the equilibrium position, but that it doesn't change the equation of motion. A linear spring always oscillates about the equilibrium position, not the natural length of the spring. In the horizontal case, the equilibrium position happens to be the natural length of the spring, but not in the vertical (or inclined) case. Since the equations of motion are the same, the periods are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lightlightsup
Brilliant analysis. THANK YOU!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K