Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread is dedicated to sharing and appreciating videos, photos, and animations of space and celestial objects, emphasizing the beauty of the Universe. Participants are encouraged to include scientific information alongside their contributions, while adhering to forum guidelines regarding mainstream science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initiates the thread by inviting others to share clips and photos of space, highlighting the beauty of the Universe.
  • Several participants share specific video clips, including time-lapse footage from the ISS and NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory.
  • Another participant mentions the upcoming capture of the Dawn spacecraft by Ceres, expressing excitement about future images from the New Horizons mission to Pluto.
  • One participant recalls a clip titled "The Known Universe" and reflects on its emotional impact while viewing the Milky Way.
  • Another shares a video about NASA astronaut Don Pettit experimenting with water in a weightless environment, noting its relevance to the thread's theme.
  • Some participants discuss the Digital Universe software, expressing mixed feelings about its representation of the solar system and the Milky Way.
  • A participant creatively describes the dynamics of Earth's atmosphere, drawing parallels to celestial phenomena and inviting further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features a variety of contributions and perspectives, with no clear consensus on specific interpretations or representations of the shared content. Participants express personal reflections and emotional responses to the videos and images, indicating a shared appreciation for the beauty of the Universe while maintaining individual viewpoints.

Contextual Notes

Some posts reference specific scientific missions and software, but the discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications and interpretations of the shared materials.

  • #2,401
Monkey head nebula. Total integration time 30 minutes, via Tecnosky 70/420 Apo, with ASI 533 color camera, on iOptron SkyHunter mount, guided.
Processed with Pixinsight and SetiAstroSuite.
Bortle 7, Ploiești, Romania.

Monk copy.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 2 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2,402
Rosette nebula. Total integration time 60 minutes.
With Canon 600 D, on iOptron SkyGuiderPro mount, through APO Tecnosky 70/420, Ploiești, bortle 7, Romania.
Initial processing with Pixinsight and later reprocessed with SetiAstroSuite.

Rosette.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 1 other person
  • #2,403
Planet Jupiter, through mak 127/1500, 2x barlow, 3 minutes integration.
Processing with PIPP, AS3 and Registax. Denoising with PS.

J2-Severe.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 2 others
  • #2,404
M 51. 4 hours total integration (2 nights), with Seestar S50.
Processing and editing with Pixinsight and SetiAstroSuite.
Ploiești, Romania, bortle 7

M 51.webp
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, AlexB23, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,405
Andy Resnick said:
Since I'm not willing to chop down trees to increase my field of view, the only thing I could image for the past month has been M27 (Dumbbell nebula):

View attachment 364863

1:1 crop
View attachment 364864

Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800/5.6 @ f/8, 6s subs, 14.5 hours viewing time on Losmandy GM-8, stacking and post-processing using Astro Pixel Processor.

Not only is the nebula and neighborhood rather boring (all things considered), it's also hard for me to image well because of the low elevation (poor seeing) and nearness to celestial equator (which is why the subframe time is so short). At least the final result looks good.... sigh.
Wow, this is high quality. Professional observatories from a hundred years ago and much bigger telescopes could not compete with your work, probably cos CMOS tech can show more contrast compared to film. Goes to show how much telescope tech evolved. And hey, sacrificing one or two trees for great pictures may be alright. Potentially plant two or three trees in an area you will not be using your telescope.
 
  • #2,406
Helix nebula. Is a planetary nebula, lies about 650 light-years, in the constellation Aquarius.
Image taken with Seestar S50, from Şirnea, BV, Romania.
The target was at low altitude and atmospheric turbulence made its presence felt. Only 40 minutes total integration time. Out of 2 hours of total exposure of 10 seconds each, many were rejected for stacking.
Processing and editing with Pixinsight and Seti Astro Suite.

Helix1.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark and davenn
  • #2,407
AlexB23 said:
Wow, this is high quality. Professional observatories from a hundred years ago and much bigger telescopes could not compete with your work, probably cos CMOS tech can show more contrast compared to film. Goes to show how much telescope tech evolved. And hey, sacrificing one or two trees for great pictures may be alright. Potentially plant two or three trees in an area you will not be using your telescope.
Thanks for the compliments!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23
  • #2,408
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks for the compliments!
You're welcome, man.
 
  • #2,409
The moon and jupiter are close enough to capture @ 400mm (about 7 degrees separation), I "helpfully" magnified jupiter pasted it on to better see the detail, one exposed to see the lunar and planetary details, and another exposed to show the 4 galilean moons:

DSC_5666 copy.webp


DSC_5669 copy.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23, Borg, Razvan Mihai and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
22K
Replies
90
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K