Outer Lebesgue Measure Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter atwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The outer Lebesgue measure is defined as m_n^* (A) = \inf \left\{ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} l(I_k) \, \left| \, A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k \right\}, where I_k are n-dimensional intervals and l(I_k) represents their geometric lengths. The distinction between A being a subset (A ⊆ ∪ I_k) versus a proper subset (A ⊂ ∪ I_k) is crucial for understanding the measure's properties. This discussion emphasizes the importance of exploring how the sum of lengths l(I_k) can approximate the lengths of larger intervals J_k, providing a deeper insight into measure theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measure theory concepts
  • Familiarity with n-dimensional intervals
  • Knowledge of geometric lengths and their properties
  • Basic grasp of set theory, particularly subset relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lebesgue measure in detail
  • Explore the concept of σ-algebras in measure theory
  • Learn about the relationship between outer measures and inner measures
  • Investigate exercises on approximating measures with larger intervals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in advanced measure theory concepts, particularly those focusing on Lebesgue measures and their applications.

atwood
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've seen the definition that an outer Lebesgue measure is defined as
[tex]m_n^* (A) = \inf \left\{ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} l(I_k) \, \left| \, A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k \right}[/tex]
where Ik are n-dimensional intervals and l(Ik) is the geometric length.

It is not actually clear to me if A has to be a proper subset. That is, does
[tex]A \subset \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
actually mean
[tex]A \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
or
[tex]A \subsetneq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k[/tex]
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the distinction between those two cases is important? Show that the sum of l(I_k) can be made arbitrarily close to the sum of the lengths of intervals J_k where each I_k is a proper subset of J_k. That's a good exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K