Lacy33
- 242
- 1
l-1j-cho said:I think my biggest problem is I don't want to admit the fact that I am not a genius as Leonhard Euler. Here is an anecdote of myself
One day our math club teacher introduced the beauty of perfect numbers and suggested to think about the reason an odd perfect number does not exist. Wasting few packages of papers, I came up with a conclusion that an odd perfect number, if it only exists, has to be in a form of (4p+1)^(4k+1) x Q^(2m) blahblah. I thought it was a truly marvelous discovery, then with the help of the internet, I soon realized that this was already done by Euler. After a moment of disappointment, I felt quite content and satisfactory that I have done something creative by 'MYSELF' of which Euler did few centuries ago
In fact, that proof is really easy to understand. I bet many other high school students could do that without any help. But the very fact that I did it by myself, I think I have fallen to delusion that I am a genious. Which contradicts the other side of me that I am not an innate genious
OK if you are a "genius", then you don't need us to tell you.
If you are a "genius" you are a very young person and remain unpublished. You have faced no peer review. You have done no high level university course work. You are not even being tutored by a university student if I understand correctly.
If you are a "genius" then you understand that the beginning of genius is the fear of what you don't know (paraphrased) and after you have done all the basics and are on par with the best in the field you can seek out your personal direction and advance the field a fraction of an inch like all other researchers today.
If you want to play genius for the day, go ahead.
But the people here have real learning to do. Read them, ask a small question here and there and then go to university and do the course work like everyone else.

