Overlap integrals and eigenstates problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 5K views
randybryan
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
To find the probability of a particle being at position x we use

<[tex]\Psi[/tex]|[tex]\Psi[/tex]> where the complex conjugate ensures that the answer is real. This means that we're looking at the square of the wave function to determine the probability of finding the particle.

Now to determine the probability of a wave function being in eigenstate n, we use the overlap integral of the wave function and normalised eigenstate (for general harmonic oscillator potential V(x) = 1/2m[tex]\omega[/tex]^{2}x^{2}) over all x. Now I don't understand why we take the square of this answer to find the probability? I know we're not looking for the probability of a position, but an energy eigenstate. I just can't follow where it comes from.
Apologies for not writing out the equation, but the Latex is screwing up for me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We DO take the square of the overlap to find the probability, in either case. The overlap is called the probability amplitude, which in general is complex, whereas a probability must be real.

In your first case, Ψ(x) (or <x|Ψ>) is the probability amplitude and Ψ*(x)Ψ(x) or <Ψ|x><x|Ψ> is the probability of finding the particle at point x. Your second case is exactly the same, except it's <n|Ψ> instead of <x|Ψ>.