Mirek2010 said:
Hello Asymptotic,
433V was what the transformer name plate stated as max output, I am new to the building, as part of the FM team; however the Schneider's load monitoring system indicates that the transformer gives out 446V on all three phases. Then the bus bar tap off unit on 9th floor is showing 446-8V and then on Level 16 are the chillers fed from L9.
Chiller commissioning eng reported (without measuring anything) that the voltage monitoring relay on the chiller package tripped and he left stating the overvoltage is exceeding manufacturer's limits and compressor cannot be run safely.
There is as well as I understand the issue that the transformers' output is excessive and non complying with current regs re supplied voltage ranges.
Not sure if we should instruct the maintenance team to step down the transformer output on tappings or not. No other plant in the building is suffering from the overvoltage issues.
Should we adjust the output from TX? or is there any other way to limit the voltage to the chillers on L16 (addition to existing building systems).
Thank you,
Can you photograph and post a picture of the transformer nameplate? Different manufacturers do it different ways, but this 433 volt 'max voltage' specification sounds like it may be secondary voltage when the transformer tap changer is maxed out (and primary voltage is at nameplate specification).
Mirek2010 said:
No other plant in the building is suffering from the overvoltage issues.
What voltages are measured at those chillers? Most of my experience is with Trane, and their chillers have brought out and displayed internally-sensed line voltage data for maybe the last 20 years. I'd expect modern units regardless of manufacturer all do the same.
What controls the compressor motor? Is it a wye-delta circuit using electomechanical contactors, or is it based on some sort of electronic soft-starter or variable speed inverter drive?
Mirek2010 said:
Should we adjust the output from TX?
Only if you are in Texas :)
I've never seen 'TX' used as an abbreviation for it, but from context I'm guessing you mean 'transformer'.
You'll have to make that decision.
@anorlunda makes an excellent point in post #4, and one that didn't occur to me as it was never an issue with our local power company. Start there.
I can say that applying 446V to a 400V machine is inadvisable, and (so long as primary voltage is within spec) changing transformer tap selection is the usual way of dealing with this type of overvoltage situation. Just be sure the transformer primary is de-energized before switching the tap changer. Most aren't built to accommodate 'hot' operation, and would suffer catastrophic failure.