MHB Oxidation Numbers: Fe203+3CO to 2Fe+3CO2

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Oxidation
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
By using oxidation numbers can someone show me what is oxidised and reduced

Fe203+3co->2Fe+3co2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
By using oxidation numbers can someone show me what is oxidised and reduced

Fe203+3co->2Fe+3co2

Hi Marko,

Making the ion forms explicit, we have:
$$
{Fe^{3+}}_2{0^{2-}}_3+3C^{2+}O^{2-}\to 2Fe+3C^{4+}{O^{2-}}_2
$$
So $Fe$ gains electrons and as such it is reduced.
And $C$ loses electrons, meaning it is oxidized.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Marko,

Making the ion forms explicit, we have:
$$
{Fe^{3+}}_2{0^{2-}}_3+3C^{2+}O^{2-}\to 2Fe+3C^{4+}{O^{2-}}_2
$$
So $Fe$ gains electrons and as such it is reduced.
And $C$ loses electrons, meaning it is oxidized.

thanks
I usually go to the periodic table and look at the elements valency and then i take this as the oxidation number. this is not always correct though?
for example carbon has a valency of 4 but in the above equation it is 2+.
so you go off the ones you know like oxygen is always -2 and the oxidation number of a compound must always equal zero.
 
markosheehan said:
thanks
I usually go to the periodic table and look at the elements valency and then i take this as the oxidation number. this is not always correct though?
for example carbon has a valency of 4 but in the above equation it is 2+.
so you go off the ones you know like oxygen is always -2 and the oxidation number of a compound must always equal zero.

Yes, in compounds oxygen is always -2.
The metals (that are oxidized) usually have more than one oxidation number, and the valency doesn't even have to be one of them (copper for example).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top