Oxidation State & Shapes of Ni(CO)4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big-Daddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxidation State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the coordination compound Ni(CO)4, the oxidation state of nickel (Ni) is 0, as carbon monoxide (CO) is a neutral ligand. The two primary geometric shapes for Ni(CO)4 are tetrahedral and square planar, with tetrahedral being the predominant structure due to the nature of CO bonding. CO coordinates to nickel through the carbon atom, facilitated by pi backbonding, which enhances the stability of the complex. The oxidation state of ligands does not change upon coordination, but the overall charge balance must be maintained.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordination chemistry and ligand behavior
  • Knowledge of oxidation states and charge balance in coordination compounds
  • Familiarity with molecular geometry, specifically tetrahedral and square planar shapes
  • Concept of pi backbonding in transition metal complexes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of coordination chemistry and ligand field theory
  • Learn about the geometric shapes of transition metal complexes
  • Study the effects of pi backbonding in metal-ligand interactions
  • Explore linkage isomerism in coordination compounds
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, particularly those studying coordination chemistry, and professionals in fields related to inorganic chemistry and materials science will benefit from this discussion.

Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In Ni(CO)4 each carbon monoxide acts as a ligand coordinating to nickel. Suggest two possible shapes for Ni(CO)4; what is the oxidation state of Ni?

The Attempt at a Solution



The oxidation state of Ni seems to be likely to be 0, because carbon monoxide itself is neutral. But is it always safe to say that the oxidation state of the atoms in a ligand do not change when the coordination bond is formed?

As for the possible shapes, they most likely mean one tetrahedral structure and one square planar structure. But my doubt there is this: with the carbon monoxide ligand, it is ever possible to get the O providing the lone electron pair and thus you could have linkage isomers where O donates instead of C? (After all, even though it is formally positive in the carbon monoxide molecule, O still has a lone pair of electrons.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Big-Daddy said:
The oxidation state of Ni seems to be likely to be 0, because carbon monoxide itself is neutral.
This is correct, and the correct way to think about the problem: add up all the charges on the ligands, and enforce neutrality with the metal's oxidation state.

Big-Daddy said:
But is it always safe to say that the oxidation state of the atoms in a ligand do not change when the coordination bond is formed?
I don't quite understand this. If the ligand is reducing or oxidizing, then the oxidation number of the metal may change. But if you're simply referring to something along the lines of: if I have two Cl- ligands, will the metal be anything but 2+ charged if the overall species is neutral? then the answer is no.

Big-Daddy said:
As for the possible shapes, they most likely mean one tetrahedral structure and one square planar structure. But my doubt there is this: with the carbon monoxide ligand, it is ever possible to get the O providing the lone electron pair and thus you could have linkage isomers where O donates instead of C? (After all, even though it is formally positive in the carbon monoxide molecule, O still has a lone pair of electrons.)
Probably these are the two they're looking for. In fact, nickel carbonyl is tetrahedral. Also, CO always bonds to transition metals through the C. There are a number of reasons for this, most importantly pi backbonding (also known as pi acidity), where the sigma metal-carbon bond is augmented by backdonation of electrons from a filled metal d orbital into the empty CO ##\pi^*## antibond.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K