P primary group and the correspondence theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jz2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correspondence theorem in the context of finite p-primary abelian groups as presented in "A First Course in Abstract Algebra" by J. Rotman. The key equation derived is p(G/S) = (pG + S)/S, which illustrates the relationship between subgroups of G and G/S. Participants clarify that the correspondence theorem establishes a one-to-one correspondence between subgroups of G/N and subgroups of G containing N, rather than merely stating isomorphisms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these definitions and relationships in abstract algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite p-primary abelian groups
  • Familiarity with the correspondence theorem in group theory
  • Knowledge of quotient groups and their properties
  • Basic concepts of subgroup definitions and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the correspondence theorem in detail, focusing on its implications for subgroup relationships
  • Explore the properties of finite p-primary abelian groups and their structure
  • Learn about quotient groups and their role in group theory
  • Review definitions and examples of subgroup operations in abstract algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory, as well as educators and researchers seeking a deeper understanding of the correspondence theorem and its applications in finite p-primary abelian groups.

jz2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question from "A first course in abstract algebra" by J. Rotman,

Hi, this is a question from " A first course in abstract algebra" by J. Rotman
define d(G) = dim(G/pG)

chapter 5, lemma 5.8 (P392),

Let G be a finite p primary abelian group.
If S<=G, then d(G/S) <= d(G)

The first line of the proof read like,


By the correspondence theorem, p(G/S) = (pG +S)/S,

How is this equation derived? As the correspondence theorem mainly states isomorphism, I cannot see where there is equation involved? It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help on this. Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jz2012 said:
Hi,

I have a question from "A first course in abstract algebra" by J. Rotman,

Hi, this is a question from " A first course in abstract algebra" by J. Rotman
define d(G) = dim(G/pG)

chapter 5, lemma 5.8 (P392),

Let G be a finite p primary abelian group.
If S<=G, then d(G/S) <= d(G)

The first line of the proof read like,


By the correspondence theorem, p(G/S) = (pG +S)/S,

How is this equation derived? As the correspondence theorem mainly states isomorphism, I cannot see where there is equation involved? It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help on this. Many thanks!


In my book (3rd edition), it is chapter 6, lemma 6.10 (i).

Now, [itex]\,p(G/S)\,:=\{p(x+S)=px +S\;|\;x\in G\}\leq G/S[/itex] , and since this is a subgroup of the quotient [itex]\,G/S\,[/itex], the

correspondence theorem tells us that there exists [itex]\,H\leq G\,\,s.t.\,\,p(G/S)=H/S\,[/itex] , and it's not hard to realize that in fact

[itex]\,H=pG+S\,[/itex] , for example [itex]\,\forall x\in G\,\,,\, px + S\in p\left(G/S\right)\Longrightarrow pG+s\leq p(G/S)\,[/itex]. Now you try to prove the other way around.

DonAntonio

Ps The correspondence theorem is *not* about isomorphisms merely but about a 1-1 correspondence between

subgroups of [itex]\,G/N\,[/itex] and subgroups of [itex]G\,[/itex] containing [itex]\,N\,[/itex].
 
Thanks a lot DonAntonio,

this is very helpful!

I am just wondering
[itex]\,p(G/S)\,:=\{p(x+S)=px +S\;|\;x\in G\}[/itex] is this a definition for p(G/S), not
[itex]\,p(G/S)\,:=\{p(x+S)=px +pS = px+ S\;|\;x\in G\}[/itex] (i assume := means definition?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K