Paradox in Induced Dipole Forces: Does it violate Newton's Third Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EM-learner
  • Start date Start date
EM-learner
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider a molecule B with a permanent dipole moment $\vec{p}_B = p_B \hat{z}$ and a polarizable molecule A with atomic polarizability $\alpha$. Molecule A is located on the $z$-axis at a distance $z$ from B.
B creates an electric field that induces a dipole moment $\vec{p}_A$ in A.
Calculate the force $\vec{F}_A$ exerted on the induced dipole A.
Calculate the force $\vec{F}_B$ exerted on the permanent dipole B by the field of A.
Compare $\vec{F}_A$ and $\vec{F}_B$. My current derivation shows $\vec{F}_B = 2\vec{F}_A$, which seems to violate Newton's Third Law.
Relevant Equations
Dipole electric field (on-axis): $\vec{E} = \frac{p}{2\pi\epsilon_0 z^3} \hat{z}$
nduced dipole: $\vec{p}_A = \alpha \vec{E}_B$
Force on a dipole in a non-uniform field: $\vec{F} = (\vec{p} \cdot \nabla) \vec{E}$
First, I calculated the field produced by B at the position of A:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
In Physics Forums you should use ## to wrap in-line LaTeX equations and $$ to wrap display equations. I've reformatted your post below:
EM-earner said:
Homework Statement: Consider a molecule B with a permanent dipole moment ##\vec{p}_B = p_B \hat{z}## and a polarizable molecule A with atomic polarizability ##\alpha##. Molecule A is located on the ##z##-axis at a distance ##z## from B.
B creates an electric field that induces a dipole moment ##\vec{p}_A## in A.
Calculate the force ##\vec{F}_A## exerted on the induced dipole A.
Calculate the force ##\vec{F}_B## exerted on the permanent dipole B by the field of A.
Compare ##\vec{F}_A## and ##\vec{F}_B##. My current derivation shows ##\vec{F}_B = 2\vec{F}_A##, which seems to violate Newton's Third Law.
Relevant Equations: Dipole electric field (on-axis): ##\vec{E} = \frac{p}{2\pi\epsilon_0 z^3} \hat{z}##
Induced dipole: ##\vec{p}_A = \alpha \vec{E}_B##
Force on a dipole in a non-uniform field: ##\vec{F} = (\vec{p} \cdot \nabla) \vec{E}##
First, I calculated the field produced by B at the position of A:
And to make our lives easier, please try using LaTeX to post your solution attempt here, rather than making us all open your PDF attachment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, EM-learner and berkeman
Your mistake comes from differentiating the dipole moment as well, whereas it must be kept constant during the differentiation. To clearly expose the issue, I will redo the calculation in the simplest possible case: a field directed only along the x-axis (which actually corresponds to your situation).

Consider a dipole formed by a charge ##q## at position ##x+a## and a charge ##-q## at position ##x##. The force acting on the dipole is:
$$
F = q\,E(x+a) - q\,E(x)
$$

Using a first-order expansion, this gives:
$$
F = q\,a\,\frac{dE}{dx} = p\,\frac{dE}{dx}
$$

This result remains valid even if ##a## is a function of ##x##. Physically, this means that the dipole, in its instantaneous configuration, responds to the spatial variation of the field.

In your case, ##a## is a function of ##x##, and you write:
$$
q\,\frac{d(aE)}{dx}
$$
which is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
renormalize said:
In Physics Forums you should use ## to wrap in-line LaTeX equations and $$ to wrap display equations. I've reformatted your post below:


And to make our lives easier, please try using LaTeX to post your solution attempt here, rather than making us all open your PDF attachment.
Thanks a lot !!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
848
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K