Parallel Plate Capacitor Spacing Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor, specifically examining how changes in the dimensions of the plates and the spacing between them affect capacitance. Participants explore the relationships defined by the capacitance equation and question the implications of varying the distance between the plates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effect of doubling the length, width, and spacing of the plates on capacitance, questioning the direct proportionality of these factors. There is also inquiry into the appropriate equation for capacitance and its limitations, particularly in complex geometries.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the capacitance equation and its simplifications, while others are exploring the implications of larger plate separations and the need for more complex calculations. Multiple interpretations of the capacitance behavior are being examined without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are references to the limitations of the basic capacitance equation, especially when the geometry of the capacitor deviates from ideal conditions. Participants also mention the need for integration in more complex scenarios, indicating a recognition of the constraints of the simplified model.

jacksonpeeble
Gold Member
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
If the length and width of each plate of a parallel plate capacitor were doubled, and the spacing between the plates was also doubled, by what factor does the capacitance change?

I know that increasing the length and width of a plate increases its capacitance, and I thought that it was directly proportional, but I'm not sure about spacing the plates... it's an interesting question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacksonpeeble said:
If the length and width of each plate of a parallel plate capacitor were doubled, and the spacing between the plates was also doubled, by what factor does the capacitance change?

I know that increasing the length and width of a plate increases its capacitance, and I thought that it was directly proportional, but I'm not sure about spacing the plates... it's an interesting question...

Do you know the equation for the capacitance in terms of the area and spacing of the plates? That equation will answer your question.
 
Is it e*Area/distance?
 
jacksonpeeble said:
Is it e*Area/distance?

Yes. C = \frac{\epsilon A}{d}

This simple equation is used a lot in capacitor calculations, but keep in mind that it is simplified from the more accurate equation. This equation ignores the fringing field at the edges of the parallel plate capacitor. For a cap with lots of area A compared to the spacing distance d, this is a fine approximation. But if the distance d is, say 1/10 of the length of one of the sides of the cap plate, then you will measure a higher C than you calculated by probably around 10% or so.

But this basic equation should be fine for your conceptual question. So what's the answer?
 
The capacitance increases by a factor of 2, because 2*2/2=2.

I feel stupid. :wink: Thanks for the help.
 
Correct. No reason to feel that way, BTW. We all had to learn to use that equation (and learn its limitations) at some point.
 
what if the distance between the plates is much larger than the diameter of the parallel plates?? how do we then calculate the capacitance?
 
priya amrute said:
what if the distance between the plates is much larger than the diameter of the parallel plates?? how do we then calculate the capacitance?

Not with the simplistic equation we've listed so far, that's for sure.

You tell us. That's how it works around here...
 
i looked around a lot..all i know is
Decreasing the separation of the plates, decreases the voltage of the capacitor since the electric-field is not affected by the distance between the plates. The voltage on the capacitor is V=Ed. Therefore the voltage increases. For a constant charge, Q, C=Q/V =Q/Ed and vice-versa..then why can't the same formula still remain applicable?
 
  • #10
i will be really glad if u can help me with this...we am working on a project where the calculation of resonant frequency is very important for which we require...
 
  • #11
priya amrute said:
i looked around a lot..all i know is
Decreasing the separation of the plates, decreases the voltage of the capacitor since the electric-field is not affected by the distance between the plates. The voltage on the capacitor is V=Ed. Therefore the voltage increases. For a constant charge, Q, C=Q/V =Q/Ed and vice-versa..then why can't the same formula still remain applicable?

When the geometry is not simple, you need to calculate the capacitance by integration, typically. C = Q/V, and you perform a surface integration to find Q, and a line integral to find V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K