I Parallel vector, I need a bit of explanation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter lioric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26
TL;DR Summary
If we are making the vector parallel to i+3j, why do we multiply 3 with the i of the resultant vector ?
Given that c = 3i + 4j and d = i - 2j, find u if uc + d is parallel to i + 3j,

this is the question

in the solution,
it says that we have to multiply the 3 with the i

i do know that this is the ”method“ to do this question but I’d like a bit of explanatio.
I don’t understand why the 3 is multiplied with the i when in the question it says 3j.

thank you for your time.
 

Attachments

  • 03E66D91-94ED-43E9-8892-99A9ADB34CAE.jpeg
    03E66D91-94ED-43E9-8892-99A9ADB34CAE.jpeg
    15 KB · Views: 123
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:
What is the vector ## \mu c + d## in terms of i and j? What does it mean for one vector to be parallel to another?

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The answer the OP, vectors ai + bj and ci + dj will be parallel if b/a = d/c. So vector ai + bj will be parallel to i + 3j if b = 3a. This is where the factor 3 comes from.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, FactChecker, topsquark and 1 other person
topsquark said:
Hint:
What is the vector ## \mu c + d## in terms of i and j? What does it mean for one vector to be parallel to another?

-Dan
If one vector is parallel that means the direction is the same. In terms of i and j the parallel vectors are always some multiple of the direction
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
DrClaude said:
The answer the OP, vectors ai + bj and ci + dj will be parallel if b/a = d/c. So vector ai + bj will be parallel to i + 3j if b = 3a. This is where the factor 3 comes from.
This speaks to me a lot. If something is parallel, the ratio of x to y lengths should be the same. Thank you very much. It makes so much more sense now.
I’ll propos this thread solved. Thank you all.
i love the way that you teach stuff
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, FactChecker and DrClaude
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top