I Parallel vector, I need a bit of explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter lioric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26
TL;DR
If we are making the vector parallel to i+3j, why do we multiply 3 with the i of the resultant vector ?
Given that c = 3i + 4j and d = i - 2j, find u if uc + d is parallel to i + 3j,

this is the question

in the solution,
it says that we have to multiply the 3 with the i

i do know that this is the ”method“ to do this question but I’d like a bit of explanatio.
I don’t understand why the 3 is multiplied with the i when in the question it says 3j.

thank you for your time.
 

Attachments

  • 03E66D91-94ED-43E9-8892-99A9ADB34CAE.jpeg
    03E66D91-94ED-43E9-8892-99A9ADB34CAE.jpeg
    15 KB · Views: 130
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:
What is the vector ## \mu c + d## in terms of i and j? What does it mean for one vector to be parallel to another?

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The answer the OP, vectors ai + bj and ci + dj will be parallel if b/a = d/c. So vector ai + bj will be parallel to i + 3j if b = 3a. This is where the factor 3 comes from.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, FactChecker, topsquark and 1 other person
topsquark said:
Hint:
What is the vector ## \mu c + d## in terms of i and j? What does it mean for one vector to be parallel to another?

-Dan
If one vector is parallel that means the direction is the same. In terms of i and j the parallel vectors are always some multiple of the direction
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
DrClaude said:
The answer the OP, vectors ai + bj and ci + dj will be parallel if b/a = d/c. So vector ai + bj will be parallel to i + 3j if b = 3a. This is where the factor 3 comes from.
This speaks to me a lot. If something is parallel, the ratio of x to y lengths should be the same. Thank you very much. It makes so much more sense now.
I’ll propos this thread solved. Thank you all.
i love the way that you teach stuff
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, FactChecker and DrClaude
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K