Parameterizing A Circle Projected onto a Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter TranscendArcu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Plane
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a vector function that parameterizes a curve in the plane defined by the equation x-y+z=2, specifically above a circle described by x² + (y-1)² = 9. Participants are exploring the implications of the curve's position relative to the circle and the nature of projections in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to parameterize the circle using trigonometric functions with adjustments for the circle's position. Some participants question whether the parameterization ensures the curve remains above the circle. Others suggest considering the geometric relationship between the cylinder formed by the circle and the plane.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the correctness of the parameterization and its implications regarding the curve's position relative to the circle. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the definition of "above" in this context, and some guidance has been offered regarding limiting the range of the parameter to ensure the curve meets the problem's requirements.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the distinction between being "above" or "below" the circle, which may affect how the parameterization is approached. The original poster is also considering the implications of the z-coordinate in relation to the xy-plane.

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a vector function that parameterizes a curve C which lies in the plane x-y+z=2 and directly above the circle x2 + (y-1)2 = 9

The Attempt at a Solution

So, in order to parameterize the circle, I simply use x=cos(t), y = sin(t) with some adjustments. Namely, I let x=3cos(t) and y=3sin(t)+1. Then, to determine how the z-coordinates of this curve change according to x,y I use the definition of the plane. So I have z=2-x+y, which I convert using my parametric defintions for x,y.

I have, z=3-3cos(t)+3sin(t). Therefore, my parameterized curve is,

<3cos(t),3sin(t)+1,3-3cos(t)+3sin(t)>

Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.
But... is it always above the circle?
 
So I just drew myself a little sketch. Basically I have plane and, beneath it, a cylinder which extends upwards, whose base represents the circle. The intersection of the cylinder and the plane should be the projection of the circle onto the plane, right? In this case, I can't see how the projection could be anywhere else besides over the circle.

As an aside, the vector projection of a onto b is given as follows:

((b [dot] a)/|a|) * a/|a|.

Is it possible to use the idea of projections along with dot products to solve this problem?
 
TranscendArcu said:
So I just drew myself a little sketch. Basically I have plane and, beneath it, a cylinder which extends upwards, whose base represents the circle. The intersection of the cylinder and the plane should be the projection of the circle onto the plane, right? In this case, I can't see how the projection could be anywhere else besides over the circle.

Consider t=-pi/4.
Is the corresponding point above or below the circle?
TranscendArcu said:
As an aside, the vector projection of a onto b is given as follows:

((b [dot] a)/|a|) * a/|a|.

Is it possible to use the idea of projections along with dot products to solve this problem?

This is the formula for projection onto a line.
It doesn't work for projection onto a plane.

Anyway, you still need a parametrization.
Your method is just fine.
The only catch is that the curve is not entirely above the circle (assuming the problem does make this fine distinction).
 
OH! I see what you mean now. So presumably I need only calculate a z-coordinate for above/below orientation:

z=3-3cos(t)+3sin(t), where t=-pi/4
z=3-3sqrt(2).

So I understand that this point is below the xy-plane, but I don't understand how this impacts the parametrization. Does it change how I am allowed to define t? If the intersection of my cylinder with the plane is still the projection, what difference does "above" or "below" make?
 
Well, as I interpret the problem (and I may be wrong), it asks for a parametrization that is "above" the circle.
So I think you're supposed to limit the range of t, such that the curve is indeed "above" the circle.
But perhaps I'm being too nit-picky. You tell me.
Still, it is good practice...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K