Parametric equation confusion of d2y/dx2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eats Dirt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Parametric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the second derivative d²y/dx² from parametric equations x=t² and y=t³-3t. The correct approach involves applying the chain rule multiple times, specifically using the formula d²y/dx² = d/dt(dy/dx) * dt/dx. Participants clarify that d/dt represents differentiation with respect to the parameter t, and emphasize the importance of ensuring that dx/dt is non-zero for the calculations to be valid. This method is essential for understanding parametric differentiation in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of differentiation with respect to a parameter
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in parametric differentiation
  • Learn how to derive higher-order derivatives from parametric equations
  • Explore examples of parametric equations in calculus
  • Investigate the implications of non-zero derivatives in parametric functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on differential equations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of parametric differentiation techniques.

Eats Dirt
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
x=t2 and y=t3-3t, find dy/dx and d2y/dx2

I understand how to get to dy/dx but an confused on how to get to d2y/dx2 can someone please explain in depth, I know the formula is (d/dt dy/dx)/(dx/dt) I don't understand where d/dt comes from and what it is. why do we not just derive it twice? I really do not understand the 2nd part at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just several applications of the chain rule

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{dt} \frac{dt}{dx} = \left(\frac{dy}{dt} / \frac{dx}{dt} \right)
from what your OP says you're familiar with this calculation. We're just going to do it again
\frac{d}{dx} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right)= \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) \frac{dt}{dx}= \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dt}/\frac{dx}{dt} right) / \frac{dx}{dt}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Office_Shredder said:
It's just several applications of the chain rule

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{dt} \frac{dt}{dx} = \left(\frac{dy}{dt} / \frac{dx}{dt} \right)
from what your OP says you're familiar with this calculation. We're just going to do it again
\frac{d}{dx} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) \frac{dt}{dx} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dt}/\frac{dx}{dt} right) / \frac{dx}{dt}

Im sorry but i still have no idea : \.
 
It will perhaps become more clear if you switch your notation slightly. How about we denote dy/dx instead by ω. Okay, so ω is a function, and what we are looking for is dω/dx. We will apply the chain rule:

dω/dx=dω/dt * dt/dx=d/dt(ω)*dt/dx

Now we simply put back dy/dx for ω to get

d2y/dx2=d/dt(dy/dx)*dt/dx as claimed. Hope that clears it up :smile:
 
Office_Shredder said:
It's just several applications of the chain rule

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{dt} \frac{dt}{dx} = \left(\frac{dy}{dt} / \frac{dx}{dt} \right)
from what your OP says you're familiar with this calculation. We're just going to do it again
\frac{d}{dx} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) \frac{dt}{dx} = \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{dy}{dt}/\frac{dx}{dt} right) / \frac{dx}{dt}

Only one note of caution with this approach: make sure dt/dx is defined which means dx/dt is non-zero (i.e. t changes with respect to x at the point you are considering and hence x also changes with respect to y)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K