Parametric Equations with Trig sub and int by parts

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving parametric equations defined by x=cos^2(t) and y=cos(t). Participants are trying to find the distance traveled by a particle and the length of the curve over a specified interval. One user attempted to use trigonometric substitution and integration by parts but encountered difficulties, leading to an incorrect answer. Another user suggested that working with x as a function of y might simplify the problem, while also noting errors in the original integration limits and substitution process. The emphasis remains on adhering to the use of parametric equations as required by the course guidelines.
NastyAccident
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


x=cos^2(t)
y=cos(t)

(a) Find the distance traveled by a particle with position (x, y) as t varies in the given time interval.

(b) What is the length of the curve?


Homework Equations



Length of an Arc: integral of alpha to beta sqrt((dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



See attached PDF for full attempt as soon as it clears...

Originally, I attempted to find a factor to easily cancel the square root out. However, with this particular problem I couldn't. So, I took out my bazooka and used Trig sub for sqrt(4u^2+1) & Integration by parts (for sec^3(s))

My answer ends up being 12(-20+ln(3)-ln(7))... Which is negative plus it is way too high for (a)...

I integrated from 0 to pi (the length of one arc, which is the answer to b) and times it by six (there are a total of six arches).

Any help is greatly appreciated and will be thanked, I've been staring at this for about 2 hours now and I still can't figure out what is off.



NastyAccident
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The graph of these parametric equations looks exactly like the graph of x = y^2, where 0 <= x <= 1, and -1 <= y <= 1. When t = 0, you get the point (1, 1), and when t = pi/2, you get the point (0,0), and when t = pi, you get the point (1, -1). That's one complete cycle. As t increases beyond pi, the points on the parabola are retraced.

It might be simpler to work with x as a function of y, rather than x and y as functions of t.
 
I didn't check past your u substitution, but you have a glaring error there. That is that you didn't change to t limits to your new u limits.

[edit adding a couple of comments]

Also, if your original interval is larger than (0,\pi) you will need to use |sin(t)| when you remove it from the square root. And for
\int\sqrt{4u^2+1}du

try the substitution 2u = sinh(w)
 
Last edited:
Mark44 said:
The graph of these parametric equations looks exactly like the graph of x = y^2, where 0 <= x <= 1, and -1 <= y <= 1. When t = 0, you get the point (1, 1), and when t = pi/2, you get the point (0,0), and when t = pi, you get the point (1, -1). That's one complete cycle. As t increases beyond pi, the points on the parabola are retraced.

It might be simpler to work with x as a function of y, rather than x and y as functions of t.

Oh, how I wish I could do that! However, the prof and the TA said we would be penalized for not using Parametric Equations in finding our answer since this chapter emphasizes the importances of parametric equations.

LCKurtz said:
I didn't check past your u substitution, but you have a glaring error there. That is that you didn't change to t limits to your new u limits.

[edit adding a couple of comments]

Also, if your original interval is larger than (0,\pi) you will need to use |sin(t)| when you remove it from the square root. And for
\int\sqrt{4u^2+1}du

try the substitution 2u = sinh(w)

Well, if you convert the u substitution back to t, then technically, I thought, you can use your original limits.

Now, is this after I substitute in for cos(t)?
\int\sqrt{4u^2+1}du

2u=sinh(w) => 2(cos(t))=sinh(w)?

Correct? (Just want to make sure about this..)



NastyAccident
 
NastyAccident said:
Oh, how I wish I could do that! However, the prof and the TA said we would be penalized for not using Parametric Equations in finding our answer since this chapter emphasizes the importances of parametric equations.

That wouldn't make any difference. Doing it the xy way you would immediately be confronted with an integral just like the one below.

Well, if you convert the u substitution back to t, then technically, I thought, you can use your original limits.
Well, you can do that; I didn't check all your work. It is much more efficient to carry the limits along through the substitution so you never have to back substitute when doing a definite integral.

Now, is this after I substitute in for cos(t)?
\int\sqrt{4u^2+1}du

2u=sinh(w) => 2(cos(t))=sinh(w)?

Correct? (Just want to make sure about this..)

Your u integral is correct once you put the proper limits on it, but no, that last equation isn't correct. This is a hyperbolic function substitution and there is no cos(t) in it. You are changing the variable from u to w. You need to compute du and use the hyperbolic identity:

\cosh^2{w} = 1 + \sinh^2{w}
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K