Length of Curve Homework: Find Integral Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter WendysRules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Length
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the length of a curve defined parametrically by the equations x = t/(1+t) and y = ln(1+t) for the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 2. Participants are exploring the integral that represents the length of the curve, which involves calculating derivatives and substituting into the length formula.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the complexity of the integral derived from the length formula and express concerns about potential algebraic mistakes or the efficiency of their approaches. Some suggest using substitutions to simplify the integral, while others question the correctness of the derivatives calculated for y.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and suggestions. Some have offered alternative methods or substitutions, while others have raised questions about the correctness of previous calculations. There is no explicit consensus on a single approach, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion in the notation used for the equations, which may have led to misunderstandings regarding the derivatives. There is also a recognition of the integral's complexity, with some expressing a desire for simpler methods or encouragement to continue despite the challenges.

WendysRules
Messages
35
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Find the length of the curve:
##x=\frac{t}{1+t}##
##y=\ln(1+t)##
where ##0 \leq t \leq 2##
Length of curve integral ##\int^a_b \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2+(\frac{dy}{dt})^2} dt##

Homework Equations


##(\frac{dx}{dt})^2 = \frac{1}{(1+t)^4}## ##(\frac{dy}{dt})^2 = \frac{1}{(1+t)^2} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I think somewhere I missed a more efficient technique to use (or made an algebra mistake which is most likely), because otherwise I think this integral gets crazy too fast for a simple problem.

Start with ##\int^a_b \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2+(\frac{dy}{dt})^2} dt## to which when we substitute our given problem, we get ##\int^2_0 \sqrt{\frac{1}{(1+t)^4}+\frac{1}{(1+t)^2}} dt## = ##\int^2_0 \sqrt{\frac{(1+t)^2+1}{(1+t)^4}} dt ## = ##\int^2_0 \frac{1}{(1+t)^2} \sqrt{(1+t)^2+1} dt##

To try to make this simpler, I said well, just let ##u = 1+t## therefore ##du=dt## so our integral looks like
##\int^2_0 \frac{1}{(u)^2} \sqrt{(u)^2+1} du## which then I believe calls for a trig substitution (let ##u=tan\theta##)... but that seems crazy! At this point why wouldn't I just de-parametrize the equation from the start if I wanted a crazy integral.

If anyone has a simpler way to go about this integral, I'd love to know. Otherwise if this seems to be the correct path, I'll just keep chugging along!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
WendysRules said:

Homework Statement


Find the length of the curve:
##x=\frac{t}{1+t}## ##y=\ln(1+t)## where ##0 \leq t \leq 2##
Length of curve integral ##\int^a_b \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2+(\frac{dy}{dt})^2} dt##

Homework Equations


##(\frac{dx}{dt})^2 = \frac{1}{(1+t)^4}## ##(\frac{dy}{dt})^2 = \frac{1}{(1+t)^2} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I think somewhere I missed a more efficient technique to use (or made an algebra mistake which is most likely), because otherwise I think this integral gets crazy too fast for a simple problem.

Start with ##\int^a_b \sqrt{(\frac{dx}{dt})^2+(\frac{dy}{dt})^2} dt## to which when we substitute our given problem, we get ##\int^2_0 \sqrt{\frac{1}{(1+t)^4}+\frac{1}{(1+t)^2}} dt## = ##\int^2_0 \sqrt{\frac{(1+t)^2+1}{(1+t)^4}} dt ## = ##\int^2_0 \frac{1}{(1+t)^2} \sqrt{(1+t)^2+1} dt##

To try to make this simpler, I said well, just let ##u = 1+t## therefore ##du=dt## so our integral looks like
##\int^2_0 \frac{1}{(u)^2} \sqrt{(u)^2+1} du## which then I believe calls for a trig substitution (let ##u=tan\theta##)... but that seems crazy! At this point why wouldn't I just de-parametrize the equation from the start if I wanted a crazy integral.

If anyone has a simpler way to go about this integral, I'd love to know. Otherwise if this seems to be the correct path, I'll just keep chugging along!

What you have done so far looks correct. Yes, the integral is messy, but that's life: some problems just have messy solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WendysRules
I don't agree with what you got for ## \frac{dy}{dt} ##. How did you get rid of the ## \ln(1+t) ## term that will show up in taking ## \frac{dy}{dt} ##?
 
Charles Link said:
I don't agree with what you got for ## \frac{dy}{dt} ##. How did you get rid of the ## \ln(1+t) ## term that will show up in taking ## \frac{dy}{dt} ##?

Maybe my logic doesn't apply here, but I say let ##1+t=u## therefore ##\ln(1+t)=\ln(u)## then ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{\frac{du}{u}}{dt}## = ##\frac{du}{udt} ##but since ##dt=du## in this case, our problem just becomes ##\frac{1}{u}## which just equals ##\frac{1}{1+t}##
 
WendysRules said:
Maybe my logic doesn't apply here, but I say let ##1+t=u## therefore ##\ln(1+t)=\ln(u)## then ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{\frac{du}{u}}{dt}## = ##\frac{du}{udt} ##but since ##dt=du## in this case, our problem just becomes ##\frac{1}{u}## which just equals ##\frac{1}{1+t}##
I see my problem: You have no space between ## x=\frac{t}{t+1} ## and ## \\ ## ## y=\ln(1+t) ##,## \\ ## and I took it to mean ## x=(\frac{t}{t+1})y ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WendysRules
Charles Link said:
I see my problem: You have no space between ## x=\frac{t}{t+1} ## and ## \\ ## ## y=\ln(1+t) ##,## \\ ## and I took it to mean ## x=(\frac{t}{t+1})y ##

I'll edit my post to make it more clear
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
I think I have a solution: Try ## u=\sinh(x) ##. If my algbra/calculus is correct, you get ## \int \coth^2(x) \, dx ##. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integrals_of_hyperbolic_functions for the integral. ## \\ ## And in a more clear form, I found it in an old CRC handbook: ## \int \coth^2(x ) \, dx=x-\coth(x) ##. ## \\ ## And presuming this is correct, it gets a little messy working backwards to ## u ##, etc., but it is workable.
 
Last edited:
WendysRules said:
Maybe my logic doesn't apply here, but I say let ##1+t=u## therefore ##\ln(1+t)=\ln(u)## then ##\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{\frac{du}{u}}{dt}## = ##\frac{du}{udt} ##but since ##dt=du## in this case, our problem just becomes ##\frac{1}{u}## which just equals ##\frac{1}{1+t}##

I did not examine all your steps in detail; I just used Maple to do the computations, and arrived at the same final expression for ##ds## that you gave.
 
Charles Link said:
I think I have a solution: Try ## u=\sinh(x) ##. If my algbra/calculus is correct, you get ## \int \coth^2(x) \, dx ##. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integrals_of_hyperbolic_functions for the integral. ## \\ ## And in a more clear form, I found it in an old CRC handbook: ## \int \coth^2(x ) \, dx=x-\coth(x) ##. ## \\ ## And presuming this is correct, it gets a little messy working backwards to ## u ##, etc., but it is workable.

I think PF prefers that we leave the solution for the OP to find, and only jump in with hints as needed. It sounds as though she did not need more help, just more encouragement to carry on despite the complexities.
 
  • #10
Ray Vickson said:
I think PF prefers that we leave the solution for the OP to find, and only jump in with hints as needed. It sounds as though she did not need more help, just more encouragement to carry on despite the complexities.
I tried the ## u=\tan(\theta) ## also, which seemed to be a good choice. It led to what appeared to be something that would be very difficult to integrate. ## \\ ## And my apologies for perhaps supplying too much to the solution. This one I found very challenging myself=I was just happy that I found something that might work...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K