Parametric Representation of a Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a parametric representation of the plane defined by the equation x + y + z = 5. Participants explore the concept of parametric equations in the context of planes and how to express points on the plane using parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the standard form of a plane and the relationship between points on the plane. There are attempts to derive a parametric representation using specific points and parameters. Some participants question the validity of their approaches and seek clarification on using variables as parameters.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas, with some participants suggesting methods to find additional points on the plane and others proposing algebraic approaches. While various interpretations are being explored, there is no explicit consensus on a single method for the parametric representation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and methods related to parametric equations for planes, indicating a need for further clarification on the topic.

Alw
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give a parametric representation of the plane x + y + z = 5.

Homework Equations



I am really not sure, I've been over the chapters we've covered for a little over an hour now, and the only mention i can find of a parametric representation of a plane is in passing once, merely stating that such a thing exists. All examples and explanations relate to

0 = a(x-x1) + b(x-x1) + c(z-z1)

where <a, b, c> is a vector normal to the plane, and (x1,y1,z1) is a point on the plane.

The Attempt at a Solution



well, I am going to assume that 0 = a(x-x1) + b(x-x1) + c(z-z1) is the standard form for planes, so I started by putting x + y + z = 5 in that form.

x + y + z = 5
x + y + z -5 = 0

i picked an arbitrary point on the plane, (2,2,1)

a(x-2) + b(y-2) + c(z-1) = 0, and therefore the coefficents must all be 1, giving me

(x-2) + (y-2) + (z-1) = 0, along with <1,1,1> being a vector normal to this plane.

i am really not sure where to go after this...
i know how to find the parametric representation of the intersection of two planes, but of the plane itself. . .

I am sorry i don't have much work to show for this, but I really have no idea where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you came up with is really the same on you started with, and it's not 'parametric'. Take your point P0=(2,2,1) on the plane and find two more points on the plane P1 and P2 such that P0,P1 and P2 don't all lie on the same line. Then you can write a parametric representation of the plane as P0+s*(P1-P0)+t*(P2-P0). Do you see why this lies on the plane for any s and t, and do you see why any point on the plane can be written in this form?
 
A plane is two dimensional. "Parametric equation" for a two-dimensional figure must be of the form x= f(u,v), y= g(u,v), z= h(u,v).

Since you are told that " the plane x + y + z = 5", and so z= 5- x-y, there is nothing at all wrong with taking x and y themselves as parameters.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A plane is two dimensional. "Parametric equation" for a two-dimensional figure must be of the form x= f(u,v), y= g(u,v), z= h(u,v).

Since you are told that " the plane x + y + z = 5", and so z= 5- x-y, there is nothing at all wrong with taking x and y themselves as parameters.

Good point. Much simpler.
 
Dick said:
The equation you came up with is really the same on you started with, and it's not 'parametric'. Take your point P0=(2,2,1) on the plane and find two more points on the plane P1 and P2 such that P0,P1 and P2 don't all lie on the same line. Then you can write a parametric representation of the plane as P0+s*(P1-P0)+t*(P2-P0). Do you see why this lies on the plane for any s and t, and do you see why any point on the plane can be written in this form?

ok, i understand how you can use those 3 points to define the plane since they arent in the same line, and i think i understand why s and t can be any value. Regardless of what value they have, they are are just a coefficient on the (position vector?) kind of like how with the equation y = x, (1,1) is on that line, along with a*(1,1), where a is any number. Any point on the plane can be used because, any point on the plane is still in the plane :P.

HallsofIvy said:
A plane is two dimensional. "Parametric equation" for a two-dimensional figure must be of the form x= f(u,v), y= g(u,v), z= h(u,v).

Since you are told that " the plane x + y + z = 5", and so z= 5- x-y, there is nothing at all wrong with taking x and y themselves as parameters.

i'm not sure i fully understand. are you saying that i can use x and y as parameters for z, x and z as parameters for y, y and z for parameters for x? how would i continue on with the problem, or can i answer it by saying

z = 5 - x - y
x = 5 - y - z
y = 5 - x - z

? I don't think I fully understand what you are sayingThank you very much for the help :)
 
Last edited:
I'm glad you get the vectorial way of thinking about it. Hall's is thinking about it algebraically. x(s,t)=s, y(s,t)=t, then z(s,t)=5-s-t is on the plane. It's the same as the other approach if P0=(0,0,5), P1=(1,0,4) and P2=(0,1,4).
 
Alw said:
ok, i understand how you can use those 3 points to define the plane since they arent in the same line, and i think i understand why s and t can be any value. Regardless of what value they have, they are are just a coefficient on the (position vector?) kind of like how with the equation y = x, (1,1) is on that line, along with a*(1,1), where a is any number. Any point on the plane can be used because, any point on the plane is still in the plane :P.



i'm not sure i fully understand. are you saying that i can use x and y as parameters for z, x and z as parameters for y, y and z for parameters for x? how would i continue on with the problem, or can i answer it by saying

z = 5 - x - y
x = 5 - y - z
y = 5 - x - z

? I don't think I fully understand what you are saying

Thank you very much for the help :)
No, I meant:
x= u
y= v
z= 5- u- v.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K