Parity formulae, orbital angular momentum, mesons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the intrinsic parity of particles, specifically mesons, and the relationship between intrinsic parity and orbital angular momentum (l). It is established that the total parity of a meson, composed of a quark and an antiquark, is given by the formula ##p=(-1)^{l+1}##, where l represents the orbital angular momentum. The participants clarify that the parity of a system is not merely the product of intrinsic parities but also incorporates the angular momentum described by spherical harmonics Y_{lm}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of intrinsic parity in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with orbital angular momentum (l) and its significance
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics Y_{lm} and their properties
  • Basic concepts of quark-antiquark pairs in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of parity in quantum systems using spherical harmonics
  • Explore the properties of mesons and their quark compositions
  • Investigate the implications of intrinsic parity in fermions versus bosons
  • Review the Particle Data Group (PDG) resources on quark models and angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the properties of mesons and angular momentum in quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
So a particle has intrinsic parity ##\pm 1 ## .
The parity of a system of particles is given by product of intrinsic parities and the result is: ##(-1)^l ## (1).

Questions:

1) How does this result follow?
and what exactly is ##l## here? so it's the orbital angular momentum, so say a particle is made up of 3 quarks, then it's described to be in a certain state, ##1p## , ##1s## states etc, so ##l## is the orbital angular momentum of this state?

2) For a meson ##p=(-1)^{l+1}##
The reasoning in my book being that the quark and antiquark have opposite intrinsic parities,

So I assume this followss from (1), although I am not seeing how??

But, in the result (1) , this is a general result for any system of particles right? So quarks and antiquarks of the same type could be included in any system yet ## (-1)^l ## still holds?Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump.
 
l is the angular momentum number. The particles in general will be described by spherical harmonic functions Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi) which have the given parity:
\hat{P} Y_{lm} (\theta, \phi) \equiv Y_{lm} (\pi-\theta, \phi+ \pi)= (-1)^l Y_{lm} (\theta, \phi)

Take for example a meson.
The meson will have a quark and antiquark q, \bar{q}.
So the intrinsic parity of the one will be +1 and the parity of the other will be -1.
On the other hand, the meson can have some spatial angular momentum number l.
So the total parity will be: (+1) \times (-1) \times (-1)^l = (-1)^{l+1}
 
So I guess you make a wrong assumption before your eq.1.
"The parity of a system of particles is given by product of intrinsic parities "
This is wrong (probably a misconception).

Again take a meson... it is a q \bar{q} state with some angular momentum l due to the quarks. Since the meson has an orbital angular momentum l, its angular distributions are described by the spherical harmonics Y_{lm}. It's from this relation that you get the eq.1 (-1)^l, and not by getting the intrinsic parities.
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/reviews/quarkmodrpp.pdf
Sec. 14.2
 
ChrisVer said:
l
The meson will have a quark and antiquark q, \bar{q}.
So the intrinsic parity of the one will be +1 and the parity of the other will be -1.

Is this always the case with a particle and antiparticle, that they have opposite parities?
 
binbagsss said:
Is this always the case with a particle and antiparticle, that they have opposite parities?
For fermions, yes. For bosons, no.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
993