Parity of function of multiple variables

Click For Summary
Determining the parity of functions of multiple variables, such as f(x,z) = xz, reveals complexities not present in single-variable functions. While f(x,z) satisfies the condition f(x,z) = f(-x,-z), the integral over a symmetric interval yields zero, indicating a conflict in parity classification. In quantum mechanics, the parity of potentials can be analyzed similarly, but a clear definition for multiple variables is lacking, often requiring separate consideration of each variable. For the potential V = xz, it is essential that the product of wavefunctions maintains even parity to avoid integration to zero. Ultimately, the parity considerations impose restrictions on quantum states, ensuring that both wavefunctions involved share the same parity for non-zero integrals.
wuhtzu
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

I was wondering how to determine the parity of a function of multiple variables.

Say the function is:

f(x,z) = xz

How would I determine its parity?

For the above function it is true that #1 f(x,z) = f(-x,-z) but its also true that #2 \int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-a}^{a}xz \dx \dz = 0.

In one variable functions #1 would indicate an even function and #2 would indicate an odd function. So I guess you cannot directly extend the concept of odd and even function from one variable to multiple variables?

The ultimate need to answer such question is to determine the parity of potentials in quantum mechanics :)

Best regards
Wuhtzu
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Parity is usually defined for functions of one variable.
 
That is correct, but it doesn't remove the need to determine the parity of potentials suchs as

V(x) = E*x
V(x,z) = c*x*z
V(z) = B*L

in quantum mechanics :( Most of them is easy because they are only dependent on one direction ie. one variable, but some, like v(x,z) = c*x*z, is dependent on more...
 
Parity (math term) is well defined for functions of one variable. I have never seen a definition for functions of more than one variable, other than for each variable separately.
 
I will post what ever answer we get when our quantum mechanics professor gets back from vacation.

Thank you for looking
 
So for this problem it turned out to be sufficient to just change sign of all variables, making it an even function.


The original problem if anyone is interested: Determine which matrix elements of the form

<n m l | V | n' m' l'> , n = n' = 2, m-m' = ? and l-l' = ?

was zero for a spherically symmetric quantum mechanical system by using selection rules.

The potential V was of the from V = x*z. The eigenstates of the spherically symmetric system has alternating even and odd parity with increasing l quantum number and the potential V = x*z is a rank k = 2 tensor.

This imposes the restriction l-l&#039; = \Delta \le 2 \le 2.

Getting restrictions on m-m' is another story.

Thanks again.

Furthermore for &lt;n m l | V | n&#039; m&#039; l&#039;&gt; \ne 0 the product of the wavefunctions <n m l | and |n' l' m'>, and the potential V has to be an even function - if it is odd it integrates to zero. Since we know that V is even both of the two wavefunctions (<n m l | or |n' m' l'>) have to have the same parity. Imposes futher restrictions on l-l' : \Delat l=0 , 2 since placing the l states 1 apart will cause one of them to be even and one of them to be odd (remember the alternating parity). But choosing l-'l = 0 or l-l'=2 causes both to be of the same parity which makes the total product even and hence the intergral non-zero.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K