Parity rule for wigner D-matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter tommyli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parity Wigner
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation properties of Wigner D-matrices under parity. Specifically, the transformation is expressed as D^j_{m m'} (\pi - \theta, \phi + \pi) = (-1)^{j + m - m'} D^j_{m m'}(\theta, \phi). It is concluded that for half-integer spins, represented by j=(2n+1)/2, this transformation is not defined due to the non-commutation of half-integer spin operators with the parity operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wigner D-matrices
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and angular momentum
  • Knowledge of parity operators in quantum theory
  • Basic grasp of half-integer and integer spin representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Wigner D-matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Study the role of parity operators in quantum systems
  • Explore the implications of half-integer spin on operator commutation
  • Investigate applications of Wigner D-matrices in quantum mechanics and particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, angular momentum theory, and representation theory, will benefit from this discussion.

tommyli
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Does anyone know how Wigner D-matrices transform under parity?

Is it something like
D^j_{m m'} (\pi - \theta, \phi + \pi) = (-1)^{j +m-m'} D^j_{m m'}(\theta, \phi)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably for j=(2n+1)/2 this is not defined because half-integer spin operator does not commute with the parity operator.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K