Partial derivative using differentials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the partial derivatives \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\), \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\), \(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\), and \(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\) given two equations: \(xs^2 + yt^2 = 1\) and \(x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4\), evaluated at the point \((x, y, s, t) = (1, -3, 2, -1)\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of differentials and the implications of treating \(s\) and \(t\) as independent or dependent variables. There are attempts to differentiate the given equations and substitute values to find the partial derivatives. Some participants suggest that \(s\) and \(t\) should be treated as independent, while others question this assumption.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to set up equations for the partial derivatives, while others are questioning the independence of the variables involved. There is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of assumptions regarding the independence of \(s\) and \(t\) in the context of the problem, which may affect the approach to finding the derivatives.

eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


If xs^2 + yt^2 = 1 and x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4, find \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}, at (x, y, s, t) = (1, -3, 2, -1)


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


I took the differential of both equations and substituted in the values and I got:

4ds + 4dx + 6dt + dy = 0 and
ds + 7dx + 9dt + 5dy = 0

but now I don't know how do find the individual partial derivatives that are being asked for. For example, for \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, I assumed t and y are constant and made dt and dy = 0 and tried to solve for ds and dx but that doesn't work.

Any ideas on how to proceed in finding these partials?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##s## and ##t## don't happen to be independent, so that ## \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial t}{\partial s} = 0##? That would make things much easier.
 
In order that this problem make any sense, s and t have to be independent so Quesadilla's comment is crucial. You should NOT assume y is constant since it is one of the dependent variables. But, taking the derivatives with respect to s you should assume t is constant (I would have said "treat t as a constant").

So from 4ds+ 4dx+ 6dt+ dy= 0 and ds+ 7dx+ 9dt+ 5dy= 0 you can get
4\frac{\partial s}{\partial s}+ 4\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 6\frac{\partial t}{\partial s}+ \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 4+ 4\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
and
\frac{\partial s}{\partial s}+ 7\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 9\frac{\partial t}{\partial s}+ 5\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 1+ 7\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 5\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
Giving you two equations to solve for \partial x/\partial s and \partial y/\partial.

Do the same thing to find the derivatives with respect to t.

Personally, I wouldn't have use "differentials". Just differentiating xs^2+ yt^2= 1 with respect to s (and treating t as a constant) gives
s^2\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 2xs+ t^2\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
and differentiating x^2s+ y^2t= xy- 4 with respect to s gives
2sx\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ x^2+ 2ty\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= x\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}+ y\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
again giving two equations to solve for \partial x/\partial s and \partial y/\partial s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quesadilla said:
##s## and ##t## don't happen to be independent, so that ## \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial t}{\partial s} = 0##? That would make things much easier.

Why do you claim are s and t not independent? If we arbitrarily specify values of s and t we can then use the equations to find x and y. In fact, I would say we can take s and t as independent, but with x and y being functions of them: x = x(s,t) and y = y(s,t).
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
Why do you claim are s and t not independent? If we arbitrarily specify values of s and t we can then use the equations to find x and y. In fact, I would say we can take s and t as independent, but with x and y being functions of them: x = x(s,t) and y = y(s,t).

If you mean that we should look to apply the implicit function theorem that sounds like an excellent idea!
 
Great, thanks everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K