Partial Differential Equation(NEED HELP)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a partial differential equation (PDE) related to fluid dynamics, specifically utilizing Darcy's Law. Participants are attempting to manipulate and rewrite the equation involving the variables of hydraulic head and flow rate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Darcy's Law to reformulate the PDE. There are attempts to clarify the signs and constants involved in the equations. Questions arise about the correct application of differentiation and the product rule, as well as the representation of variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on differentiation techniques and the application of the product rule. There is a recognition of errors in initial formulations, and some participants are exploring the implications of these corrections. Multiple interpretations of the PDE are being examined, particularly concerning the presence of specific terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an acknowledgment of missing elements in the original problem setup, particularly regarding initial conditions for the PDE.

andrey21
Messages
475
Reaction score
0
Using Darcy's Law given below:

q(x.t) = -k dh/dx

Show that:

-d/dx.(q(x,t)h(x,t)) = phi dh/dt

Can be written as:

K(h(d^(2)u/dx^(2)) +(du/dx)^2)) = phi dh/dt

Any help would be greatly appreciated, I am nt to sure where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have:
<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(h(t,x)q(t,x))=\phi\frac{\partial h}{\partial t}<br />
Insert Darcy's law to obtain:
<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left( -kh(t,x)\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)=\phi\frac{\partial h}{\partial t}<br />
 
Ok I have done what u suggested although think u missed a minus sign out at the front. Do I pull the k outside the brackets??
 
check the signs...
 
Ah ok so what is the next step, take out k as I suggested??
 
Should I use the fact that:

h(x,t) can be represented by:

dh/dt = k d^(2) h/dx^(2)
 
I was thinking, should tou have q(t,x)h(t,x)? Should it just be q(t,x)?
 
its q(t,x)h(t,x).
 
Sorry but the first post contained an error. I need to rewrite the PDE so it becomes:

K(h(d^(2)h/dx^(2)) +(dh/dx)^2)) = phi dh/dt
 
  • #10
The k is a constant so that can be taken out of the derivative and then it should all fall into place.

Mat
 
  • #11
Ye ok so doing that I obtain:

k(d/dx h(t,x) dh/dx) = phi dh/dt

How do I get to the required answer from here.

Thanks in advance.
 
  • #12
Just take k out and differentiate:
<br /> -k\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right( h(t,x)\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)=-k\frac{\partial^{2}h}{\partial x^{2}}-k\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)^{2}<br />
 
  • #13
Rite so:

k(d/dx h(t,x) dh/dx) = phi dh/dt

now differentating:

d/dx h(x,t) = d^2h/dx^2

dh/dx = (dh/dx)^2

is this correct??

Also there is a h missing from the final answer.
 
  • #14
Jamiey1988 said:
Rite so:

k(d/dx (h(t,x) dh/dx)) = phi dh/dt

now differentating:

d/dx h(x,t) = d^2h/dx^2

dh/dx = (dh/dx)^2

is this correct??

Also there is a h missing from the final answer.

Remember the product rule? You use it here. (parentheses bolded, because that's the part to concentrate on).
 
  • #15
Ah yes:

d/dx(uv) = udv/dx + vdu/dx

so with that in mind:

u =h(t,x)
v = dh/dx

correct?
 
  • #16
Jamiey1988 said:
Ah yes:

d/dx(uv) = udv/dx + vdu/dx

so with that in mind:

u =h(t,x)
v = dh/dx

correct?

You got it.
 
  • #17
Great, problem is I am nt sure how to differentiate either of those numbers??
 
  • #18
Jamiey1988 said:
Great, problem is I am nt sure how to differentiate either of those numbers??

Well, what's the partial derivative wrt x of \frac{\partial h}{\partial x}? How about h(x,t)?
 
  • #19
well the partial derivative of h(x,t) is

d^(2) h/ dxdt

is this correct?
 
  • #20
Jamiey1988 said:
well the partial derivative of h(x,t) is

d^(2) h/ dxdt

is this correct?

Not quite. That is the "mixed second partial derivative" of h(x,t). The partial derivative of h(x,t) wrt x is just \partial h / \partial x.
 
  • #21
Ah i see got a little confused there so I now have value for v du/dx as (dh/dx)^2. I just can't work out partial dervative for dh/dx
 
  • #22
Jamiey1988 said:
Ah i see got a little confused there so I now have value for v du/dx as (dh/dx)^2. I just can't work out partial dervative for dh/dx

Just differentiate it again. You should get d^2 h / dx^2
 
  • #23
Yes i see now so putting that together I obtain:

u dv/dx + vdu/dx

h(t,x).d^2h/dx^2 + (dh/dx)^2

In the final answer given the h(t,x) isn't there. Do this cancel out?
 
  • #24
Jamiey1988 said:
Yes i see now so putting that together I obtain:

u dv/dx + vdu/dx

h(t,x).d^2h/dx^2 + (dh/dx)^2

In the final answer given the h(t,x) isn't there. Do this cancel out?

I see an h in your original post. I think that's the h(t,x) we're talking about, and so I'm pretty sure it is there.
 
  • #25
Ah great thanks Char.limit for all ur hep.
 
  • #26
No problem at all.
 
  • #27
Hey char.limit I have another question which is posing a few problems.

Given the following pde:

du/dt = y^2 d^2u/dx^2

where t> 0 0<x<L

where L is 4000 and Y^2 = HK/phi

if t=0 is the time when river flow is altered, write down an initial condition for u.

Again bit unsure where to start on this one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K