Discussion Overview
The discussion focuses on the capabilities of Mathematica 7 in solving nonlinear second order partial differential equations (PDEs), particularly in the context of groundwater flow modeling. Participants explore syntax issues, numerical solutions, and the necessity of initial and boundary conditions.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Homework-related
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the ability of Mathematica 7 to solve nonlinear second order PDEs using DSolve, noting that the output returns the original question.
- Another participant suggests that while Mathematica can solve PDEs with known solutions, nonlinear second order PDEs typically lack such solutions, implying a need for numerical methods.
- A suggestion is made to test a very simple example with a known closed form solution to troubleshoot the use of Mathematica before tackling the more complex problem.
- The original poster provides a specific groundwater flow equation and expresses difficulty in obtaining a solution, questioning the need for initial and boundary conditions when using numerical methods like FEM/FDM in Mathematica.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the capabilities of Mathematica 7 regarding nonlinear PDEs, with some advocating for numerical approaches while others emphasize the importance of testing simpler examples. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific syntax and methods for solving the groundwater flow equation.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the solvability of nonlinear PDEs and the dependence on specific initial and boundary conditions for numerical methods. The discussion does not clarify these aspects fully.