Partial differential with respect to y

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the partial derivative of the function f(x,y) = (x³ + y³)^(1/3) with respect to y at the point (0,0). The correct evaluation shows that f_y(0,0) = 1, despite initial calculations suggesting otherwise. The function is not differentiable at (0,0) due to the discontinuity of the partial derivatives at that point. A detailed analysis reveals that while the partial derivatives exist, they are not continuous, necessitating a limit approach to confirm the derivative's value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of limits and continuity in multivariable functions
  • Basic concepts of differentiability in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of differentiability in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the continuity of partial derivatives
  • Explore limit definitions of derivatives in calculus
  • Investigate the implications of non-differentiable points in functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians analyzing multivariable functions, and anyone interested in the nuances of differentiability and continuity in mathematical analysis.

issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Partial differential with respect to y

Homework Statement


Given the equation f(x,y) = (x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{1/3}[/tex]

Show that [tex]f_{y}[/tex](0,0) = 1


Homework Equations


Basic chain rule..

The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the chain rule...I believe that

[tex]f_{y}[/tex] = 1/3(x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{-2/3}[/tex] 3y[tex]^{2}<br /> <br /> or<br /> <br /> f_{y}[/tex] = y[tex]^{2}[/tex](x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{-2/3}[/tex]

However, plugging in (0,0) does make [tex]f_{y}[/tex] equivalent to 1. Where is my mistake? Any help would be greatly appreciated.. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that the function f, itself, is not differentiable at (0,0) even though the partial derivatives exist at (0,0). (But the partial derivatives are not continuous at (0,0).)

Go back to the original definition of the derivative:
At (0,0), f(x,y)= f(0,0)= 0.

For h not 0, f(0,0+h)= f(0,h)= ((h)3)1/3= h.
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(0,0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(0,h)- f(0,0)}{h}= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{h- 0}{h}= 1[/tex]
 
Yah, you can tell right away something is fishy because the work you did, if you actually plug in x and y = 0, not only doesn't yield 1, it gives you 0/0

A bit of thinking and you'll see the original f(x,y) is undefined for x and y less than 0(one of them can be negative, but x^3+y^3 must be positive)

So at the point (0,0) the function kinda "comes into existence", so it's like a sharp sudden point where it begins, instead of being [math words that I forget], so you know you need to do a slightly more detailed analysis to find the derivative
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K