Partial differential with respect to y

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Partial differential with respect to y

Homework Statement


Given the equation f(x,y) = (x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{1/3}[/tex]

Show that [tex]f_{y}[/tex](0,0) = 1


Homework Equations


Basic chain rule..

The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the chain rule...I believe that

[tex]f_{y}[/tex] = 1/3(x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{-2/3}[/tex] 3y[tex]^{2}<br /> <br /> or<br /> <br /> f_{y}[/tex] = y[tex]^{2}[/tex](x[tex]^{3}[/tex] + y[tex]^{3}[/tex])[tex]^{-2/3}[/tex]

However, plugging in (0,0) does make [tex]f_{y}[/tex] equivalent to 1. Where is my mistake? Any help would be greatly appreciated.. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that the function f, itself, is not differentiable at (0,0) even though the partial derivatives exist at (0,0). (But the partial derivatives are not continuous at (0,0).)

Go back to the original definition of the derivative:
At (0,0), f(x,y)= f(0,0)= 0.

For h not 0, f(0,0+h)= f(0,h)= ((h)3)1/3= h.
[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(0,0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(0,h)- f(0,0)}{h}= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{h- 0}{h}= 1[/tex]
 
Yah, you can tell right away something is fishy because the work you did, if you actually plug in x and y = 0, not only doesn't yield 1, it gives you 0/0

A bit of thinking and you'll see the original f(x,y) is undefined for x and y less than 0(one of them can be negative, but x^3+y^3 must be positive)

So at the point (0,0) the function kinda "comes into existence", so it's like a sharp sudden point where it begins, instead of being [math words that I forget], so you know you need to do a slightly more detailed analysis to find the derivative