1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Partial Drivative- Inclined Plane Problem

  1. Oct 8, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A ping pong ball is projected (with velocity v)from a foot of an inclined plane with an inclination of [tex]\beta[/tex] . The initial velocity of projection makes an angle [tex]\alpha[/tex] with the surface of th incline. Find the relation beteen [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex] such that the range is maximum.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    Time of flight=[tex]\frac{2v sin \alpha}{g cos \beta}[/tex]

    Range(R)=[tex]\frac{2 v^{2} sin \alpha cos \alpha}{g cos \beta}-\frac{4 tan \beta v^{2} sin ^{2} \alpha}{g cos \beta}[/tex]

    Now the range is a function of both [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex]. I have been searching how to do the derivative. I learned from mathworld.wolfram that I need to consider one quantity constant and differentiate with respect to the other. and then do the same by keeping the other constant. Then by adding these partial derivatives I can get the complete derivative of the function concerned (which in my case is the range of the projectile).

    [tex]\frac{\delta R}{d\alpha}=\frac{2 v^{2} cos 2\alpha}{g cos \beta}-\frac{4 v^{2} tan \beta sin 2\alpha}{g cos \beta}[/tex]

    [tex]\frac{\delta R}{d\beta}=\frac{v^{2} sin 2\alpha tan \beta}{g cos \beta}-\frac{4 v^{2} sin^{2} \alpha(2tan^{2}\beta+1)}{g cos \beta}[/tex]

    Adding these two and putting them equal to zero does not yield the desired result. I am stuck. Please help me with this.
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 9, 2008 #2
    One method is to resolve the velocity in the plane parallel to the incline slope and perpendicular to the inclined slope.

    wait while i try it out
  4. Oct 9, 2008 #3
    I done just that. I have resolved it along the surface of incline and perpendicular to it.

    Yup! take your time!! :approve:
  5. Oct 10, 2008 #4
    x = ucos[tex]\beta[/tex]t - 0.5gsin[tex]\alpha[/tex]t[tex]^{2}[/tex] ----1
    y = usin[tex]\beta[/tex]t - 0.5gcos[tex]\alpha[/tex]t[tex]^{2}[/tex] ---- 2
    At the point of impact, y = 0
    Hence, t = (2usin[tex]\beta[/tex]) / (gcos[tex]\alpha[/tex]) --- 3

    put 3 into 1
    and differentiate with respect to [tex]\beta[/tex]

    you shld end up with

    tan 2[tex]\beta[/tex] = cot[tex]\alpha[/tex]

    thus, [tex]\beta[/tex] = pi/4 - [tex]\alpha[/tex]/2

    EDIT: switch all the alpha with beta and beta with alpha
  6. Oct 10, 2008 #5


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    You have an error in your Range; you should have

    [tex]R=\frac{2 v^{2} sin \alpha cos \alpha}{g cos \beta}+\frac{2 tan \beta v^{2} sin ^{2} \alpha}{g cos \beta} [/tex]

    It looks like you forgot to multiply your at^2 term by (1/2), and it should be +(1/2)at^2, not minus. (Assuming your g is -9.8m/s^2)

    The total derivative of R is given by:

    [tex]dR=\frac{\partial R}{\partial \alpha}d \alpha +\frac{\partial R}{\partial \beta}d \beta [/tex]

    At a local max/min the total derivative will be zero, so each partial derivative must also vanish. Compute the partial derivatives and set them equal to zero.
  7. Oct 30, 2008 #6
    Can you please explain how you got that relation?
  8. Nov 4, 2008 #7


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Hmmm...did you understand my last post? Is there anything in there that you don't understand?
  9. Nov 4, 2008 #8
    To an extent...
    You were right that i forgot to multiply that by 1/2 but there would be a minus sign there.

    I didn't understand how you got the total derivative?
    And then is it necessary that if z=x+y and z=0, then how come can we say that x=0, and y=0 are the only solutions???

    And I am facing problems in deriving the required relation between alpha and beta!
  10. Nov 4, 2008 #9


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The total derivative of a function of two variables, say [itex]f(x,y)[/itex] is by definition:

    [tex]df=\left| \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \right| d x +\left| \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \right| d y[/tex]

    Since [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] are independent variables, so are there total derivatives [itex]dx[/itex] and [itex]dy[/itex]; and so the only way that [itex]df[/itex] can be zero is if each of the partial derivatives [tex]\frac{ \partial f}{\partial x}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{ \partial f}{\partial y}[/tex] are zero.

    Do you follow this?
  11. Nov 4, 2008 #10
    Yup! I do it now. As x is independent of y at all times, therefore we cannot force it to become a function of y to get the minimum value. right?
    just like saying if
    x i+ y j=0 i+ 0 j
    in vector notation, then x=0 and y=0. right >
  12. Nov 4, 2008 #11


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    More or less, yes.

    So in this case your function is [itex]R(\alpha,\beta)[/itex] and so [tex]\frac{\partial R}{\partial \alpha}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial R}{\partial \beta}[/tex] must both be zero at the local max/min...what do you get when you compute these partial derivatives....where are they zero?
  13. Nov 4, 2008 #12

    Thanks a lot!! I am very grateful to you. I have got my result.
  14. Nov 4, 2008 #13


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Congrats! :smile:
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook