MHB Partial Fraction Decomposition when denominator can't be further factored

AI Thread Summary
To approach the fraction x^2 / (x^2 + 9), recognize that the numerator and denominator have the same degree, which complicates partial fraction decomposition. Instead, rewrite the expression as 1 - (9 / (x^2 + 9)), allowing for easier integration. This method is a common technique for handling such fractions. If the goal is integration, this transformation simplifies the process significantly. Understanding the relationship between the degrees of the numerator and denominator is crucial for determining the appropriate approach.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I have this fraction

$$x^2 / (x^2 + 9)$$

I'm not sure how to approach this problem since the denominator can't be further factored. What is the right approach for this type of problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In order to do partial fractions we must have an expression that has a lower order in the numerator than in the denominator. In your case they are the same. So you would be looking for a form like [math]\frac{Ax + B}{x^2 + 9}[/math].

I would suggest looking at it like this:
[math]\frac{x^2}{x^2 + 9} = \frac{x^2 + 9 - 9}{x^2 + 9} = 1 - \frac{9}{x^2 + 9}[/math]
which is now in the desired form.

This is a fairly common trick.

-Dan
 
tmt said:
I have this fraction: $$x^2 / (x^2 + 9)$$

I'm not sure how to approach this problem since the denominator can't be further factored.
What is the right approach for this type of problem?
it depends on what you intend to do with it.

If you are trying to decompose it into Partial Fractrions, nothing can be done.

If you are trying to integrate it:

. . \int\frac{x^2}{x^2+9}dx \;=\;\int\frac{x^2+9 - 9}{x^2+9} dx

. . =\;\int\left(\frac{x^2+9}{x^2+9} - \frac{9}{x^2+9}\right)dx \;=\;\int\left(1 - \frac{9}{x^2+9}\right) dx \;\cdots\;\text{etc.}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top