Partial Fraction Expansion for Denominator Coefficients

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rules of Partial Fraction Expansion (PFE) regarding denominator coefficients in the context of inverse Laplace transforms. Participants confirm that denominators can have coefficients other than 1, as illustrated by the example A/(3x+9). However, it is recommended to factor out the coefficient for simplification, as shown in the transformation of the term 5/(s(3s^2+30s+63)) into (1/3)(k1/s + k2/(s+3) + k3/(s+7)). This approach aids in correctly identifying the coefficients for the PFE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Partial Fraction Expansion (PFE)
  • Familiarity with inverse Laplace transforms
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of fractions
  • Knowledge of polynomial factorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of factoring polynomials for PFE
  • Learn about the application of inverse Laplace transforms in control systems
  • Explore examples of PFE with non-unit coefficients
  • Investigate the significance of coefficient manipulation in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with Laplace transforms and require a solid understanding of Partial Fraction Expansion techniques.

btbam91
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
For PFE, can a denominator variables with coefficient of something other than 1, or does it have to be 1?

For Example, can I have a term A/(3x+9)?

It's been years since I've dealt with this and don't quite remember if this was a rule or not.

Thanks!

EDIT: This is in terms of taking the inverse laplace transform later.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to put things into perspective, is the first image ok or do I have to follow what I did in the second image?
 

Attachments

  • 11.PNG
    11.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 429
  • 22.PNG
    22.PNG
    10.1 KB · Views: 444
btbam91 said:
For PFE, can a denominator variables with coefficient of something other than 1, or does it have to be 1?

For Example, can I have a term A/(3x+9)?

It's been years since I've dealt with this and don't quite remember if this was a rule or not.

Thanks!

EDIT: This is in terms of taking the inverse Laplace transform later.

You can do it either way. But why would you not factor out the 3?

attachment.php?attachmentid=50620&d=1347238675.png


attachment.php?attachmentid=50621&d=1347238675.png
 
It's just been a while since I've done these. For some reason I thought it was a rule that the coefficients had to be 1 or something.

In my 2nd image, is it set up correctly? Where the 3 remains on the left but the K1/s should not be K1/3s?
 
btbam91 said:
In my 2nd image, is it set up correctly? Where the 3 remains on the left but the K1/s should not be K1/3s?

Oh, I missed that.

To find the coefficients the second way, you should include the 1/3 as follows.
\displaystyle \frac{5}{s(3s^2+30s+63)}=<br /> \frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{k_1}{s}+\frac{k_2}{s+3}+ \frac{k_3}{s+7}\right)​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K