Partial Sum Approximation for Alternating Harmonic Series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a value for n such that the nth partial sum of the alternating harmonic series approximates the infinite series sum to three decimal places. The subject area includes series convergence and properties of alternating series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of a formula for the nth partial sum and question the existence of such a formula. There is discussion about the behavior of the partial sums, specifically whether they are increasing or decreasing. Some participants suggest examining the properties of the digamma function and its relation to the series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being considered. Some participants provide insights into the behavior of the series and suggest methods for approximating the sum, while others express skepticism about certain methods and propose alternative approaches.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential issues with numerical computation, particularly regarding subtractive roundoff errors, which may affect the accuracy of approximations. The original poster's attempts to derive a formula are noted as unsuccessful, leading to further exploration of the topic.

DavidE721
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a value for n for which the nth partial sum is ensured to approximate the sum of the alternating harmonic infinite series to three decimal places.

Homework Equations



Sn = Ʃ(-1)^k+1*1/k = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 + 1/5 - . . .

S1 = 1
S2 = 1 - 1/2
S3 = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3
S4 = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 -1/4

.
.
.

Sn = ?

The Attempt at a Solution



An attempt was made to derive a formula that would permit finding the value of the nth partial sum (e.g., S1000 = ?), but without success. It appears as though such a formula might not exist. Any help in this regard would be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DavidE721 said:

Homework Statement



Find a value for n for which the nth partial sum is ensured to approximate the sum of the alternating harmonic infinite series to three decimal places.

Homework Equations



Sn = Ʃ(-1)^k+1*1/k = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 + 1/5 - . . .

S1 = 1
S2 = 1 - 1/2
S3 = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3
S4 = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 -1/4

.
.
.

Sn = ?

The Attempt at a Solution



An attempt was made to derive a formula that would permit finding the value of the nth partial sum (e.g., S1000 = ?), but without success. It appears as though such a formula might not exist. Any help in this regard would be most appreciated.

There is a formula, but it involves the non-elementary function "digamma" function Psi(x), defined as
[tex]\Psi(x) = \frac{d}{dx} \ln \left( \Gamma(x) \right) <br /> = \frac{\Gamma^{\prime}(x)}{\Gamma(x)}.[/tex] Here, ##\Gamma## is the standard Gamma function. According to Maple 11 the sum is:
Sum((-1)^(k-1)/k,k=1..N):lprint(%);Sum((-1)^(k-1)/k,k = 1 .. N) <--echo the input

S:=value(%): lprint(S);
ln(2)+1/2*(-1)^(N+1)*Psi(1+1/2*N)+1/2*(-1)^N*Psi(1/2*N+1/2). <--- output

That is,
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^N (-1)^{k-1} \frac{1}{k}<br /> = \ln(2) + \frac{1}{2}(-1)^N \left[ \Psi\left(\frac{N}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\right) -<br /> \Psi\left(\frac{N}{2}+1\right) \right].[/tex]
 
I doubt you know digamma functions, so that's not going to be the way to solve it.

Let [itex]s=\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}[/itex] and let [itex]s_n[/itex] be the n-th partial sum.

Can you show that [itex]s_{2n+1}[/itex] is decreasing? And that [itex]s_{2n}[/itex] is increasing? Can you conclude from that that [itex]s_{2n}\leq s \leq s_{2n+1}[/itex]?

What can you say about [itex]|s_{2n+1}-s_{2n}|[/itex]?? What does this say about [itex]|s-s_n|[/itex]?? Do you obtain a formula for how well the approximation is?
 
micromass said:
I doubt you know digamma functions, so that's not going to be the way to solve it.

Let [itex]s=\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}[/itex] and let [itex]s_n[/itex] be the n-th partial sum.

Can you show that [itex]s_{2n+1}[/itex] is decreasing? And that [itex]s_{2n}[/itex] is increasing? Can you conclude from that that [itex]s_{2n}\leq s \leq s_{2n+1}[/itex]?

What can you say about [itex]|s_{2n+1}-s_{2n}|[/itex]?? What does this say about [itex]|s-s_n|[/itex]?? Do you obtain a formula for how well the approximation is?

I agree about it not being the way to solve it, but he/she did ask. If one is going to use a computer, one might as well just do a recursive computation (although avoiding subtractive roundoff errors is an issue for getting accurate numbers).
 
Ray Vickson said:
I agree about it not being the way to solve it, but he/she did ask. If one is going to use a computer, one might as well just do a recursive computation (although avoiding subtractive roundoff errors is an issue for getting accurate numbers).

Sure. I was not criticizing your post as it was very informative! I was merely informing the OP of a more elementary method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K