Say you have a particle in a one-dimensional box of length L.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The particle can only have momentum values of the form

[itex] p_{n} = \frac{nh}{2L} [/itex] according to the De Broglie standing wave condition.

Now say I don't measure the position of the particle, but I know for certain that it is in the box. Then the uncertainty in the position is [itex] Δx = \frac{L}{2} [/itex].

Therefore, the uncertainty of the momentum is [itex] Δp ≥ \frac{h}{\pi L} [/itex] (where I used Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle that [itex] Δx Δp ≥ \frac{h}{2π} [/itex].

Now, suppose my instruments are good enough so that their only limit is that set by Heisenberg. Then [itex] Δp = \frac{h}{\pi L} [/itex]. But then, suppose I measured a momentum of [itex]\frac{2h}{2L} [/itex]. Then the uncertainty of my momentum measurement is less than the distance to the next integer-multiple momentum value. Therefore I know, for sure, that the momentum is exactly 2h/(2L) since assuming otherwise would mean accepting values in-between, contradicting quantization. But then the uncertainty is 0, contradicting Heisenberg.

I reach a contradiction. I assume Quantum mechanics are correct, so there must be a mistake in my reasoning. But I don't see it. Can you show me?

My only guess, for now, is that one of the formulas I used are not exactly correct, and a more advanced course in QM will explain it better. (By the way, I'm only in a college-level course so I don't know much about QM formalism)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Particle in a box and Heisenberg Uncertainty principle paradox?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**