Particle Kinematics with Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a brick sliding down an inclined roof, with a focus on the effects of friction. The original poster seeks to determine the speed of the brick upon reaching the gutter, given the weight of the brick and the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of free body diagrams and the equations of motion, with some suggesting a reevaluation of the frictional force and the use of symbols instead of numbers. Others explore the elimination of mass from the equations and the implications for acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided alternative methods, such as energy approaches, to verify the results. There is ongoing exploration of numerical discrepancies, with participants questioning their calculator settings and the values used for gravitational acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of unit consistency and the potential impact of calculation errors on the final velocity. There is mention of the original poster's confusion regarding the correct application of the equations and the order of operations in calculations.

aaronfue
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.5-lb brick is released from rest A and slides down the inclined roof. If the coefficient of friction between the roof and the brick is μ=0.3, determine the speed at which the brick strikes the gutter G.

The Attempt at a Solution



These are the equations that I got after setting up my FBD attached:

Fr(friction force) = 0.3*Normal force
ƩFx = 0.04658ax = -Fr + 1.5sin30°
ax = -11.81 [itex]\frac{ft}{s^2}[/itex]

Then using the kinematic equation v2 = vo2 + 2a(s-so)

vo = 0
v2 = 2(11.81)(15)
v = 18.82[itex]\frac{ft}{s}[/itex]

But that is not the correct velocity. I know I'm missing something. I just can't find it! The correct answer was 15.23 ft/s.
 

Attachments

  • Roof.JPG
    Roof.JPG
    12.9 KB · Views: 660
  • FBD.JPG
    FBD.JPG
    19.3 KB · Views: 615
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your general approach seems sound, but it's hard to tell where you went wrong because you left so many steps out, and because you plugged in the numbers so early (when you do that you lose information about where the numbers came from).

I would suggest that you do it again using symbols instead of numbers. Pay particular attention to the frictional force.
 
First of all, you do not really care what the mass or weight of the brick is.

[tex] N = mg \cos \alpha<br /> \\ Fr = - \mu N = - \mu mg \cos \alpha<br /> \\ ma = mg \sin \alpha + Fr = mg \sin \alpha - \mu mg \cos \alpha[/tex]

##m## can now be eliminated from the equation.
 
voko said:
First of all, you do not really care what the mass or weight of the brick is.

[tex] N = mg \cos \alpha<br /> \\ Fr = - \mu N = - \mu mg \cos \alpha<br /> \\ ma = mg \sin \alpha + Fr = mg \sin \alpha - \mu mg \cos \alpha[/tex]

##m## can now be eliminated from the equation.

Okay. I have arrived at your final equation of:

a=gsinθ - μgcosθ (Eliminating the mass)

Now that I have the acceleration, I can plug this into my kinematic equation to obtain the final velocity as the brick completes the 15 ft or (s-so).

v2 = vo2 + 2*(gsinθ - μgcosθ)*(s-so)
vo2 = 0, since the brick started at rest.

If I were to plug in my values now, this would not be my answer.
 
Last edited:
aaronfue said:
If I were to plug in my values now, this would not be my answer.

I get the required answer using that equation.
Alternatively, you can do this by energy methods to get:(Take zero of potential at start of gutter) $$mgh - F_fd = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\,\Rightarrow\,v^2 = 2(gh - \mu g\cos \theta d),$$ to get the same answer.
 
CAF123 said:
I get the required answer using that equation.
Alternatively, you can do this by energy methods to get:(Take zero of potential at start of gutter) $$mgh - F_fd = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\,\Rightarrow\,v^2 = 2(gh - \mu g\cos \theta d),$$ to get the same answer.

You got 15.23 ft/s? I've been using two calculators (TI-89 & TI-83 plus) and have still not gotten that answer. I have made sure to be in the correct mode as well (degrees) but I'm not sure what my problem is. Would you be able to explain your calculations on your calculator or tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
aaronfue said:
You got 15.23 ft/s? I've been using two calculators (TI-89 & TI-83 plus) and have still not gotten that answer. I have made sure to be in the correct mode as well (degrees) but I'm not sure what my problem is. Would you be able to explain your calculations on your calc?

So you are in the correct mode. What value are you taking for ##g?##. I converted everything into the more conventional units we use today. Would that be your problem?
 
CAF123 said:
So you are in the correct mode. What value are you taking for ##g?##. I converted everything into the more conventional units we use today. Would that be your problem?

I'm using 32.2ft/s2 since we are using ft in the problem. I'll try to convert everything to m/s and 9.81m/s2.
 
aaronfue said:
I'm using 32.2ft/s2 since we are using ft in the problem. I'll try to convert everything to m/s and 9.81m/s2.

That would also be valid. What number are you getting?
 
  • #10
CAF123 said:
That would also be valid. What number are you getting?

For a second I was getting 11.20210. Now I am getting 21.799. I've attached a screenshot of my calculation.

Wait...I've got it!

I guess my order of operations was not going well. And I forgot to multiply μ*g.

I only had μcosθ.

The attachment shown was after calculating the sin and cos separately, then multiplying by 15, and then by 2. The square root of 232.025838 gives me my answer.
 

Attachments

  • SCREEN01.JPG
    SCREEN01.JPG
    5.8 KB · Views: 622
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
803
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K