Particular Solution of A Coupled and Driven Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a coupled oscillator problem involving two masses connected by springs and subjected to driving forces. The equations of motion are given by the second-order differential equations for masses m1 and m2, which are influenced by the spring constant k. The proposed solution involves assuming a trial function for the displacements x1 and x2 that oscillate at the driving frequency of 2ω. The user successfully simplifies the problem by adding and subtracting the equations, leading to a new variable z that combines the two displacements, ultimately allowing for a solution to the driving force's influence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled differential equations
  • Familiarity with matrix algebra in the context of physics
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators and their equations of motion
  • Experience with trial solutions for differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of undetermined coefficients for solving non-homogeneous differential equations
  • Learn about eigenvalue problems in the context of coupled oscillators
  • Explore the application of matrix methods to solve systems of differential equations
  • Investigate the effects of varying driving frequencies on coupled oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics, mechanical systems, and differential equations.

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider two masses m connected to each other and two walls by three springs with spring constant k. The left mass is subject to a driving force ## F_d\cos(2 \omega t) ## and the right to ## 2F_d\cos(2 \omega t) ##

Homework Equations



Writing out the coupled equations:

$$ m_1 x_1''+2kx_1-kx_1 = F_d \cos (2\omega t) $$
$$ m_2 x_2''-kx_1+2kx_2 = 2F_d\cos (2 \omega t) $$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]

Assume a solution
$$ x_1 = A_1 \cos (\omega t) \rightarrow x_1'' = -A_1 \omega^2 \cos (\omega t) $$
$$ x_2 = A_2 \cos (\omega t) \rightarrow x_2'' = -A_2 \omega^2 \cos (\omega t) $$

Sub this into our original equation and write it as a matrix equation

$$ -\omega^2 \cos (\omega t) \left( \begin{array}{c} A_1 \\ A_2 \end{array} \right) + \omega^2 \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{array} \right) = \frac{F_d}{m} \cos (2 \omega t) \left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 2 \end{array} \right) $$

where ##\omega^2 = k/m ##. This is where I get stuck, before we would form an eignevalue problem and solve the characteristic polynomial to get the eigenvalues then the constants ##A_1## and ##A_2## however we have too many terms to do this.

A suggestion on where to go from here would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The frequency ω in the driving forces is not necessarily equal to ##\sqrt{k/m}##. You should use another notation, such as ##\omega_0^2 = k/m##.

Since the driving forces have frequency ##2 \omega##, you might be better off with a trial solution where ##x_1## and ##x_2## vary with frequency ##2 \omega##.
 
TSny said:
The frequency ω in the driving forces is not necessarily equal to ##\sqrt{k/m}##. You should use another notation, such as ##\omega_0^2 = k/m##.

Since the driving forces have frequency ##2 \omega##, you might be better off with a trial solution where ##x_1## and ##x_2## vary with frequency ##2 \omega##.

Thanks for the reply! That was my bad actually in copying the question, it does specify in the problem that the frequency of the driving for is equal to ##\sqrt{k/m}##. I believe I managed to get the solution after a couple hours of work by adding the two equations and subtracting the two equations and making a substitution of variables:

Adding the Two
$$(x_1''+x_2'')+\omega^2(x_1+x_2)=\frac{3F_d}{m} \cos (2 \omega t) $$
Set ##z=x_1+x_2 \rightarrow z''=x_1''+x_2''##
Gives
$$z''+\omega^2 z = \frac{3F_d}{m} \cos (2 \omega t)$$

Similar argument for subtracting the two. Is it possible to solve this question using a matrix equation? I don't see any simple way of doing so but may not be seeing it.

Otherwise thanks for the help!
 
PatsyTy said:
Is it possible to solve this question using a matrix equation? I don't see any simple way of doing so but may not be seeing it.
Yes. Proceed as in your first post, but assume ##x_1## and ##x_2## vary as ##\cos2\omega t##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PatsyTy

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K