Partition function of modified Ising model

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
$$H = - J ( \sum_{i = odd}) \sigma_i \sigma_{i+1} - \mu H ( \sum_{i} \sigma_i ) $$
So basically, my idea was to separate the particles in this way::
##N_{\uparrow}## is the number of up spin particles

##N_{\downarrow}## "" down spin particles

##N_1## is the number of pairs of particles close to each other with spin up

##N_2## "" with spin down

##N_3## "" with spin antiparallel
Therefore
$$\hat{H} = - J (N_1 + N_2 - N_3 ) - \mu H (N_{\uparrow} - N_{\downarrow})$$
Subject to the following constraints:
$$\frac{N}{2} = N_1 + N_2 + N_3$$

$$N_{\uparrow} = 2N_1 + N_3$$

$$N_{\downarrow} = 2N_2 + N_3$$

$$N = N_{\uparrow} + N_{\downarrow}$$
But, even make this clarifications, i can't see how to find the partition! If we substitute the above expressions on ##\sum e^{-\hat{H}/kT}##, we will find Z as a function of, for example, ##Z=Z(N_{\uparrow},N_3)##. But i don't know how to evaluate such a sum! I mean, it can't factoriz in the sum of two expoents, because both arguments are constrained! (We can't have ##N_3 = N/2, N_{\uparrow} = 0##, for example)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Done!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top