Parton Distributions in PP collisions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the parton distribution functions (PDFs) of quarks and antiquarks in proton-antiproton collisions, particularly in the context of Z boson production. It is established that the PDFs for up and down antiquarks are not equal, as demonstrated by the violation of the Gottfried sum rule in multiple experiments. The contributions from sea and valence quarks further complicate the equality of distributions, with the presence of more pi+ mesons than pi- in the proton pion cloud being a significant factor. Understanding these differences is crucial for analyzing rare events in high-energy physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parton distribution functions (PDFs)
  • Familiarity with the Gottfried sum rule
  • Knowledge of quark and antiquark interactions in high-energy collisions
  • Basic concepts of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Gottfried sum rule violations in particle physics
  • Study the role of sea quarks in proton structure
  • Explore the production mechanisms of Z bosons in proton-antiproton collisions
  • Examine the CPT theorem and its consequences on particle-antiparticle relationships
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students studying quantum chromodynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the intricacies of parton distributions and boson production processes.

philip041
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I read some notes answering a question about how a Z boson is made in a proton anti-proton collision and it said that the quark antiquark collision is a very rare event because the antiquark has a small parton distribution function. Surely the up anti up(or down antidown) parton distributions are the same? The general context is the discovery of the W+ W- and Z bosons. Were these all quite difficult processes to observe?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philip041 said:
Surely the up anti up(or down antidown) parton distributions are the same?
I can see why their integrals should cancel, but I doubt they must be equal in all variables one can cook.

On top of that, for up or down you have contributions from the sea and the valence as well. The valence is defined as this part which does not cancel when integrated. Depending on your kinematics, the valence may contribute a lot.
 
Neither the integrals nor the distributions of ubar and dbar are equal.
The "Gottfried sum rule" which assumes they are equal has been shown to be violated in several experiments. A good reason for their difference is that there are more pi+ mesons than there are pi- in the proton pion cloud. Use "surely" carefully.
 
clem said:
Neither the integrals nor the distributions of ubar and dbar are equal.
It was about the equality of u_sea with ubar_sea (on one hand, and on the other hand d_sea with dbar_sea) if I understand the question.
 
Lol I'm out my depth already, cheers for the replies but I think I will have to hunt my elusive lecturer down...
 
humanino said:
It was about the equality of u_sea with ubar_sea (on one hand, and on the other hand d_sea with dbar_sea) if I understand the question.

Those aren't equal either, I'm afraid.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Those aren't equal either, I'm afraid.
That's what I tried to convey in #2
 
Can you give us the specific quote? I think there may be some misunderstanding here. It is an obvious consequence of CPT theorem that the spin-averaged pdf of the up-quark in proton is equal to the spin-averaged pdf of the antiup-quark in antiproton. And neither of them is small.

This quote "the quark antiquark collision is a very rare event because the antiquark has a small parton distribution function" might make sense in the context of trying to observe Z on a proton-proton collider. It is indeed rather unlikely to find an energetic antiquark inside a proton.
 
Last edited:
hamster143 said:
...
If I CPT an up quark, I get an antiup, not a down.
 
  • #10
grr yes that's what I meant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
916
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K